Performance study and simulation analysis of CSMA and IEEE 802.11 in wireless sensor networks and limitations of IEEE 802.11

S. Chowdhury, Mohamamd Tauhidul Islam, Fariha Tasmin Jaigirdar, Md. Rokan Uddin Faruqui, S. Noor
{"title":"Performance study and simulation analysis of CSMA and IEEE 802.11 in wireless sensor networks and limitations of IEEE 802.11","authors":"S. Chowdhury, Mohamamd Tauhidul Islam, Fariha Tasmin Jaigirdar, Md. Rokan Uddin Faruqui, S. Noor","doi":"10.1109/ICCIT.2009.5407277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its birth wireless communication became an indispensible part of the modern society. One major area that has a gigantic impact on the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer. Many random access protocols exist in wireless sensor networks. Some of these protocols include Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (MACA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance for wireless (MACAW) and IEEE 802.11. All the protocols mentioned above except CSMA use Request To Send/Clear To Send (RTS/CTS) packets to avoid collisions (hidden terminal problem) which was a great problem for CSMA and that is the reason CSMA is almost obsolete for wireless communications. But after using RTS/CTS packets the protocols have to encounter some extra problems such as, energy consumption and end-to-end delay. The objective of this paper is to show the pros and cons of using RTS/CTS packets by comparing CSMA (does not use RTS/CTS) and IEEE 802.11 (uses RTS/CTS packets). We also portray that under some specific scenario the IEEE 802.11 is outperformed by CSMA which is also the novelty and contribution of this research work. This observation suggests that a lot of works have to be done to consider IEEE 802.11 an approximate perfect MAC layer protocol for WSNs.","PeriodicalId":443258,"journal":{"name":"2009 12th International Conference on Computers and Information Technology","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 12th International Conference on Computers and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT.2009.5407277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Since its birth wireless communication became an indispensible part of the modern society. One major area that has a gigantic impact on the performance of wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer. Many random access protocols exist in wireless sensor networks. Some of these protocols include Carrier Sense Multiple Access (CSMA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (MACA), Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance for wireless (MACAW) and IEEE 802.11. All the protocols mentioned above except CSMA use Request To Send/Clear To Send (RTS/CTS) packets to avoid collisions (hidden terminal problem) which was a great problem for CSMA and that is the reason CSMA is almost obsolete for wireless communications. But after using RTS/CTS packets the protocols have to encounter some extra problems such as, energy consumption and end-to-end delay. The objective of this paper is to show the pros and cons of using RTS/CTS packets by comparing CSMA (does not use RTS/CTS) and IEEE 802.11 (uses RTS/CTS packets). We also portray that under some specific scenario the IEEE 802.11 is outperformed by CSMA which is also the novelty and contribution of this research work. This observation suggests that a lot of works have to be done to consider IEEE 802.11 an approximate perfect MAC layer protocol for WSNs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CSMA和IEEE 802.11在无线传感器网络中的性能研究与仿真分析以及IEEE 802.11的局限性
无线通信自诞生之日起就成为现代社会不可或缺的一部分。介质访问控制(MAC)层是影响无线传感器网络(wsn)性能的一个重要方面。无线传感器网络中存在多种随机接入协议。其中一些协议包括载波感知多址(CSMA)、防碰撞多址(MACA)、无线防碰撞多址(MACAW)和IEEE 802.11。除了CSMA之外,上述所有协议都使用请求发送/清除发送(RTS/CTS)数据包来避免冲突(隐藏终端问题),这是CSMA的一个大问题,这也是CSMA在无线通信中几乎过时的原因。但是在使用了RTS/CTS包之后,协议会遇到一些额外的问题,比如能耗和端到端延迟。本文的目的是通过比较CSMA(不使用RTS/CTS)和IEEE 802.11(使用RTS/CTS数据包)来展示使用RTS/CTS数据包的利弊。我们还描述了在某些特定场景下,IEEE 802.11的性能优于CSMA,这也是本研究工作的新颖性和贡献。这一观察结果表明,要将IEEE 802.11视为wsn的近乎完美的MAC层协议,还有很多工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Content clustering of Computer Mediated Courseware using data mining technique An audible Bangla text-entry method in Mobile phones with intelligent keypad Design of meandering probe fed microstrip patch antenna for wireless communication system Can Information Retrieval techniques automatic assessment challenges? Logical clock based Last Update Consistency model for Distributed Shared Memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1