Ascertaining educational outcomes after assessment in children with learning disorders

D. Waber, Ellen C. Boiselle, J. Girard, Joseph L. Amaral, P. Forbes
{"title":"Ascertaining educational outcomes after assessment in children with learning disorders","authors":"D. Waber, Ellen C. Boiselle, J. Girard, Joseph L. Amaral, P. Forbes","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2016.1244289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To survey educational outcomes after an interdisciplinary, neuropsychologically based team assessment for learning disorders.Method: Parents of 137 children who underwent a comprehensive interdisciplinary neuropsychologically based assessment for learning problems completed an online survey one to four years later. Questions pertained broadly to school outcomes: positive or negative school responses, changes in special education services, and parental perceptions about the helpfulness of those services. These outcomes were examined in relation to demographic characteristics and parent satisfaction with the evaluation. We also obtained recent performance on state-based academic testing for descriptive purposes.Results: Parents reported that schools generally responded positively (78%), and 70% reported that their children had access to more or different special education services after the evaluation. Parents nearly uniformly (98%) viewed these services as helpful. Positive changes in education services were related to income (lower income received more services, p < .05) and parent satisfaction with the evaluation (p < .05). The intensity of special education services was strongly related to performance on state-based testing (p < .0001–p < .01).Conclusions: School response is a relatively objective and meaningful metric of educational outcome after neuropsychologically based evaluation for children with learning problems.","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1244289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To survey educational outcomes after an interdisciplinary, neuropsychologically based team assessment for learning disorders.Method: Parents of 137 children who underwent a comprehensive interdisciplinary neuropsychologically based assessment for learning problems completed an online survey one to four years later. Questions pertained broadly to school outcomes: positive or negative school responses, changes in special education services, and parental perceptions about the helpfulness of those services. These outcomes were examined in relation to demographic characteristics and parent satisfaction with the evaluation. We also obtained recent performance on state-based academic testing for descriptive purposes.Results: Parents reported that schools generally responded positively (78%), and 70% reported that their children had access to more or different special education services after the evaluation. Parents nearly uniformly (98%) viewed these services as helpful. Positive changes in education services were related to income (lower income received more services, p < .05) and parent satisfaction with the evaluation (p < .05). The intensity of special education services was strongly related to performance on state-based testing (p < .0001–p < .01).Conclusions: School response is a relatively objective and meaningful metric of educational outcome after neuropsychologically based evaluation for children with learning problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定学习障碍儿童评估后的教育成果
摘要目的:探讨跨学科、基于神经心理学的学习障碍小组评估后的教育效果。方法:137名儿童的父母在一到四年后完成了一项在线调查,这些儿童接受了基于学习问题的综合跨学科神经心理学评估。问题广泛地涉及到学校的结果:积极或消极的学校反应,特殊教育服务的变化,以及家长对这些服务的帮助的看法。这些结果与人口统计学特征和家长对评估的满意度有关。为了描述目的,我们还获得了最近在基于州的学术测试中的表现。结果:家长反映学校的反应普遍是积极的(78%),70%的家长表示他们的孩子在评估后获得了更多或不同的特殊教育服务。几乎一致(98%)的家长认为这些服务是有帮助的。教育服务的正向变化与收入(低收入者获得更多的服务,p < 0.05)和家长对评价的满意度相关(p < 0.05)。特殊教育服务的强度与州基础测试的表现密切相关(p < .0001 - p < .01)。结论:对有学习问题的儿童进行基于神经心理学的评估后,学校反应是一个相对客观和有意义的教育效果指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender and Autism Program: A novel clinical service model for gender-diverse/transgender autistic youth and young adults. Neuropsychological functioning of pediatric patients with long COVID. A roadmap for psychometrist training: Moving from condemnation and confusion to cooperation and collaborationA Neuropsychologist’s Guide to Training Psychometrists: Promoting Competence in Psychological Testing. edited by Ghilain, C. S. New York: Routledge. (2021), ­160 pages. ISBN: 036756498X. $140.00 (hbk) Introductory editorial to the special issue: Assessment and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related clinical decision making in neuropsychological practice Affirmative neuropsychological practice with transgender and gender diverse individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1