Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions

I. Ruchkin, Matthew Cleaveland, Radoslav Ivanov, Pengyuan Lu, Taylor J. Carpenter, O. Sokolsky, Insup Lee
{"title":"Confidence Composition for Monitors of Verification Assumptions","authors":"I. Ruchkin, Matthew Cleaveland, Radoslav Ivanov, Pengyuan Lu, Taylor J. Carpenter, O. Sokolsky, Insup Lee","doi":"10.1109/iccps54341.2022.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closed-loop verification of cyberphysical systems with neural network controllers offers strong safety guarantees under certain assumptions. It is, however, difficult to determine whether these guar-antees apply at run time because verification assumptions may be violated. To predict safety violations in a verified system, we propose a three-step confidence composition (CoCo) framework for monitoring verification assumptions. First, we represent the sufficient condition for verified safety with a propositional logical formula over assumptions. Second, we build calibrated confidence monitors that evaluate the probability that each assumption holds. Third, we obtain the confidence in the verification guarantees by composing the assumption monitors using a composition function suitable for the logical formula. Our CoCo framework provides theoretical bounds on the calibration and conservatism of compositional monitors. Two case studies show that compositional monitors are calibrated better than their constituents and successfully predict safety violations.","PeriodicalId":340078,"journal":{"name":"2022 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iccps54341.2022.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Closed-loop verification of cyberphysical systems with neural network controllers offers strong safety guarantees under certain assumptions. It is, however, difficult to determine whether these guar-antees apply at run time because verification assumptions may be violated. To predict safety violations in a verified system, we propose a three-step confidence composition (CoCo) framework for monitoring verification assumptions. First, we represent the sufficient condition for verified safety with a propositional logical formula over assumptions. Second, we build calibrated confidence monitors that evaluate the probability that each assumption holds. Third, we obtain the confidence in the verification guarantees by composing the assumption monitors using a composition function suitable for the logical formula. Our CoCo framework provides theoretical bounds on the calibration and conservatism of compositional monitors. Two case studies show that compositional monitors are calibrated better than their constituents and successfully predict safety violations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核查假设监测员的置信度组成
基于神经网络控制器的网络物理系统闭环验证在一定的假设条件下提供了强有力的安全保证。然而,很难确定这些保证在运行时是否适用,因为可能违反验证假设。为了预测验证系统中的安全违规行为,我们提出了一个三步置信度组成(CoCo)框架来监测验证假设。首先,我们用假设上的命题逻辑公式表示了验证安全性的充分条件。其次,我们建立校准的信心监视器,评估每个假设成立的概率。第三,利用适合于逻辑公式的组合函数组合假设监视器,获得验证保证的置信度。我们的CoCo框架为组合监视器的校准和保守性提供了理论界限。两个案例研究表明,成分监测器的校准比其成分更好,并成功地预测了安全违规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poster Abstract: Scheduling Dynamic Software Updates in Safety-critical Embedded Systems - the Case of Aerial Drones Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for Co-design of Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems Decentralized Multi-agent Coordination under MITL Tasks and Communication Constraints Safety from Fast, In-the-Loop Reachability with Application to UAVs Blind Spots of Objective Measures: Exploiting Imperceivable Errors for Immersive Tactile Internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1