{"title":"The Natural Forum Revisited","authors":"A. Bell","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers and revisits the concept of the ‘natural forum’ thirty-five years after the landmark decision of the House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex. It considers the role of that concept throughout the common law world and whether the concept is still fit for purpose in light of changes in the legal and procedural landscape during this period.","PeriodicalId":333808,"journal":{"name":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This essay considers and revisits the concept of the ‘natural forum’ thirty-five years after the landmark decision of the House of Lords in Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex. It considers the role of that concept throughout the common law world and whether the concept is still fit for purpose in light of changes in the legal and procedural landscape during this period.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
