How Did Taiwan Go from ‘Most Affected’ during sars to ‘Least Affected’ during covid-19?

Alzbeta Loduhova, Kristina Kironska
{"title":"How Did Taiwan Go from ‘Most Affected’ during sars to ‘Least Affected’ during covid-19?","authors":"Alzbeta Loduhova, Kristina Kironska","doi":"10.1163/24688800-20221249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTaiwan was one of the places most affected by sars in 2003—but one of the least affected by covid-19 in the first year of the pandemic. Taiwan deployed a centralised approach and has been able to effectively eliminate the threat of the spread of covid-19 through swift decisions and effective action. This paper compares and evaluates the Taiwanese government’s emergency responses to two health crises: sars in 2003 and covid-19 in 2020. The policy responses to both are mapped out on easily comprehensible timelines. The study also explores how one crisis governance influences another—how the mishandling of the sars outbreak influenced early governmental responses to covid-19. These are described in more detail, divided into thematic sections, and accompanied by illustrative images.","PeriodicalId":203501,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Taiwan Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Taiwan Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24688800-20221249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taiwan was one of the places most affected by sars in 2003—but one of the least affected by covid-19 in the first year of the pandemic. Taiwan deployed a centralised approach and has been able to effectively eliminate the threat of the spread of covid-19 through swift decisions and effective action. This paper compares and evaluates the Taiwanese government’s emergency responses to two health crises: sars in 2003 and covid-19 in 2020. The policy responses to both are mapped out on easily comprehensible timelines. The study also explores how one crisis governance influences another—how the mishandling of the sars outbreak influenced early governmental responses to covid-19. These are described in more detail, divided into thematic sections, and accompanied by illustrative images.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾如何从sars期间的“受影响最严重”到covid-19期间的“受影响最小”?
2003年,台湾是受非典影响最严重的地区之一,但在疫情爆发的第一年,台湾是受covid-19影响最小的地区之一。台湾采取了集中防控的办法,通过迅速决策和有效行动,有效消除了新冠病毒传播的威胁。本文比较和评估了台湾政府对2003年sars和2020年covid-19两场卫生危机的应急反应。对这两项政策的回应都是在易于理解的时间表上制定的。该研究还探讨了一项危机治理如何影响另一项危机治理——sars疫情的处理不当如何影响政府对covid-19的早期反应。它们被更详细地描述,分为专题部分,并附有说明性图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Openness of Death: (Re)constructing Indigenous Identity in Post–martial Law Taiwan ‘They Will Shoot You to a Pulp!’ The Racialisation of Migrant Workers in the Emotive Cyberspace of ptt The Practice of Post-Handover Party Interactions between Hong Kong and Taiwan Taiwan’s Regional Identity under the New Southbound Policy Is Taiwan a Small Island? Relational and Representational Perceptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1