Distributed Electric Propulsion and Flight Control Concept to Meet EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9 Catastrophic Failure Criteria

P. Darmstadt, Mihir Mistry, Andrew Arkebauer, Allan Beiderman, Ephraim Chen, C. Dillard, Sheevangi Pathak
{"title":"Distributed Electric Propulsion and Flight Control Concept to Meet EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9 Catastrophic Failure Criteria","authors":"P. Darmstadt, Mihir Mistry, Andrew Arkebauer, Allan Beiderman, Ephraim Chen, C. Dillard, Sheevangi Pathak","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of the current work was to develop an all-electric distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) architecture that will have no more than 10-9 catastrophic failures per flight hour (pfh). The DPFC architecture was broken into four system design teams, the (i) electrical power and distribution system, (ii) drive and power system, (iii) thermal management system (TMS), and (iv) flight control system (FCS). System designs were updated and iterated upon, working with reliability and safety analysis teams, to develop compliant designs. The firm designs were reflected in a preliminary system safety assessment (PSSA) for initial verification of compliance. Additionally, design and analysis excursions are presented in which aircraft attributes were modified to investigate sensitivities to propulsion type, number of rotors, and control schemes. Excursion results found that all aircraft evaluated likely have paths to comply with the stringent, probabilistic catastrophic failure criteria. However, S&C models showed large power transients that must be addressed and PSSA results show that future work is needed in single load path structures, high voltage power storage and distribution, and in motor/rotor overspeed protection.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of the current work was to develop an all-electric distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) architecture that will have no more than 10-9 catastrophic failures per flight hour (pfh). The DPFC architecture was broken into four system design teams, the (i) electrical power and distribution system, (ii) drive and power system, (iii) thermal management system (TMS), and (iv) flight control system (FCS). System designs were updated and iterated upon, working with reliability and safety analysis teams, to develop compliant designs. The firm designs were reflected in a preliminary system safety assessment (PSSA) for initial verification of compliance. Additionally, design and analysis excursions are presented in which aircraft attributes were modified to investigate sensitivities to propulsion type, number of rotors, and control schemes. Excursion results found that all aircraft evaluated likely have paths to comply with the stringent, probabilistic catastrophic failure criteria. However, S&C models showed large power transients that must be addressed and PSSA results show that future work is needed in single load path structures, high voltage power storage and distribution, and in motor/rotor overspeed protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满足EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9灾难性失效标准的分布式电力推进和飞行控制概念
目前的工作目标是开发一种全电力分布式推进和飞行控制(DPFC)架构,该架构每飞行小时(pfh)的灾难性故障不超过10-9次。DPFC架构分为四个系统设计团队,(i)电力和配电系统,(ii)驱动和动力系统,(iii)热管理系统(TMS), (iv)飞行控制系统(FCS)。系统设计更新和迭代,与可靠性和安全性分析团队合作,开发符合要求的设计。公司设计反映在初步系统安全评估(PSSA)中,用于初步验证合规性。此外,还提出了设计和分析偏差,其中修改了飞机属性以研究对推进类型,旋翼数量和控制方案的敏感性。偏移结果发现,所有被评估的飞机可能都有符合严格的概率灾难性故障标准的路径。然而,S&C模型显示了必须解决的大功率瞬变问题,PSSA结果表明,在单负载路径结构,高压功率存储和分配以及电机/转子超速保护方面需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hover Performance in Ground Effect Prediction Using a Dual Solver Computational Methodology AW609 Civil Tiltrotor Drive Train Torsional Stability Analysis and Certification Test Campaign  Boiling Down Aviation Data: Development of the Aviation Data Distillery Reliability-Driven Analysis, Design and Characterization of Rotorcraft Structures: Decision-Making Framework High-Speed Rotorcraft Pitch Axis Response Type Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1