{"title":"Comparison of Coupled and Decoupled Seismic Analysis of TLP Piles","authors":"H. Suroor, Amir Arablouei","doi":"10.4043/29546-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Tension-leg-platforms (TLPs) are increasingly being used in offshore regions of high seismicity. The TLP foundation typically consists of very long driven piles supporting the TLP tendon loads. These piles experience significant uplift loads generated by the inherent system buoyancy. API RP 2T is considered the industry standard for TLP design which provides guidance on foundation design; however; available guidance on seismic design of TLP foundations is limited. The focus of this paper is to present and compare two types of seismic design methods for TLP piles and discuss associated outcomes, which should provide greater insight into the complexities involved in seismic design analysis.\n The seismic analysis of TLP piles can be performed in two ways; coupled and decoupled analysis. In a conventional decoupled analysis, as practiced in the industry, the foundation pile is analyzed independent of the TLP structure considering various design loading conditions, including seismic loads. In the coupled analysis, the entire system including TLP structure, tendons, and piles are modeled and analyzed as one integrated system. This is done to investigate both system and component responses due to the impact of seismic ground motions. In the coupled approach, the system can be analyzed by the response spectra method for an extreme level earthquake (ELE) and the dynamic non-linear analysis for an abnormal level earthquake (ALE). The effects of seismic kinematics and inertia, soil degradation due to cyclic loading, soil damping, etc. are considered in both types of analyses.\n Two case studies are presented where these methods have been applied for two TLP projects located in seismically active regions. The outcome of the study is to present a comparison between the conventional decoupled approach and the proposed coupled seismic analyses of TLP piles. This comprehensive seismic study aims to provide detailed insight into the seismic design methods of a TLP foundation to supplement the design guidance presented in API RP 2T. Although complex and time consuming, the proposed coupled approach provides greater insight into the system response.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29546-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Tension-leg-platforms (TLPs) are increasingly being used in offshore regions of high seismicity. The TLP foundation typically consists of very long driven piles supporting the TLP tendon loads. These piles experience significant uplift loads generated by the inherent system buoyancy. API RP 2T is considered the industry standard for TLP design which provides guidance on foundation design; however; available guidance on seismic design of TLP foundations is limited. The focus of this paper is to present and compare two types of seismic design methods for TLP piles and discuss associated outcomes, which should provide greater insight into the complexities involved in seismic design analysis.
The seismic analysis of TLP piles can be performed in two ways; coupled and decoupled analysis. In a conventional decoupled analysis, as practiced in the industry, the foundation pile is analyzed independent of the TLP structure considering various design loading conditions, including seismic loads. In the coupled analysis, the entire system including TLP structure, tendons, and piles are modeled and analyzed as one integrated system. This is done to investigate both system and component responses due to the impact of seismic ground motions. In the coupled approach, the system can be analyzed by the response spectra method for an extreme level earthquake (ELE) and the dynamic non-linear analysis for an abnormal level earthquake (ALE). The effects of seismic kinematics and inertia, soil degradation due to cyclic loading, soil damping, etc. are considered in both types of analyses.
Two case studies are presented where these methods have been applied for two TLP projects located in seismically active regions. The outcome of the study is to present a comparison between the conventional decoupled approach and the proposed coupled seismic analyses of TLP piles. This comprehensive seismic study aims to provide detailed insight into the seismic design methods of a TLP foundation to supplement the design guidance presented in API RP 2T. Although complex and time consuming, the proposed coupled approach provides greater insight into the system response.
张力腿平台(TLPs)越来越多地用于高地震活动性的海上地区。TLP基础通常由支撑TLP肌腱载荷的很长的打孔桩组成。这些桩承受由固有体系浮力产生的显著的上拔荷载。API RP 2T被认为是TLP设计的行业标准,为基础设计提供指导;然而;可用于TLP基础抗震设计的指导是有限的。本文的重点是介绍和比较两种类型的TLP桩的抗震设计方法,并讨论相关的结果,这应该提供更深入地了解地震设计分析所涉及的复杂性。TLP桩的抗震分析有两种方法;耦合和解耦分析。在传统的解耦分析中,根据行业惯例,考虑各种设计荷载条件(包括地震荷载),对基础桩进行独立于TLP结构的分析。在耦合分析中,将包括支腿墩结构、筋、桩在内的整个系统作为一个整体系统进行建模和分析。这样做是为了研究地震地面运动影响下的系统和部件反应。在耦合方法中,系统可以用极级地震的反应谱法和异常级地震的动力非线性分析方法进行分析。在这两种类型的分析中都考虑了地震运动学和惯性的影响、循环荷载引起的土壤退化、土壤阻尼等。本文介绍了两个案例研究,其中这些方法已应用于位于地震活跃区的两个张力腿平台项目。研究的结果是将传统的解耦方法与提出的TLP桩耦合地震分析方法进行比较。这项全面的地震研究旨在提供TLP基础抗震设计方法的详细见解,以补充API RP 2T中提出的设计指导。尽管复杂且耗时,所建议的耦合方法提供了对系统响应的更深入的了解。