AN EXAMINATION OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN

Francis Amagoh
{"title":"AN EXAMINATION OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN KAZAKHSTAN","authors":"Francis Amagoh","doi":"10.52123/1994-2370-2022-651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fiscal decentralization is said to offer a number of benefits for public sector governance, including economic growth, accountability, and responsiveness of government officials to local demands and needs. Increased autonomy over revenues and expenditures through separation of control over different tax bases between the central and regional government has the potential to promote the efficiency and accountability of local governance. Kazakhstan, been a unitary state has all revenues collection and allocation decisions made by the central government. Allocations to the regions are made based on certain criteria, such as size, demography, importance of the region to the national economy, etc. This means that regional and local governments have little incentives to devise means that would generate internal revenues. This can give local officials a convenient scapegoat for their shortcomings in providing public services, as they could easily pass the blame to the central government. The aim of this paper is to examine how granting more accountability and revenue-generating authority to Kazakhstan’s regions would improve public service delivery, and have an aggregate macroeconomic performance and growth for the country as a whole. The methodology is based on the use of secondary sources (such as government reports, policy documents, etc.). The paper contributes to the body of knowledge by cautioning that fiscal decentralization without accountability to the local populace limits the benefit of responsiveness to local needs, while highlighting the importance of local fiscal autonomy on fiscal performance, amongst others.","PeriodicalId":101499,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL SERVICE","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND CIVIL SERVICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52123/1994-2370-2022-651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fiscal decentralization is said to offer a number of benefits for public sector governance, including economic growth, accountability, and responsiveness of government officials to local demands and needs. Increased autonomy over revenues and expenditures through separation of control over different tax bases between the central and regional government has the potential to promote the efficiency and accountability of local governance. Kazakhstan, been a unitary state has all revenues collection and allocation decisions made by the central government. Allocations to the regions are made based on certain criteria, such as size, demography, importance of the region to the national economy, etc. This means that regional and local governments have little incentives to devise means that would generate internal revenues. This can give local officials a convenient scapegoat for their shortcomings in providing public services, as they could easily pass the blame to the central government. The aim of this paper is to examine how granting more accountability and revenue-generating authority to Kazakhstan’s regions would improve public service delivery, and have an aggregate macroeconomic performance and growth for the country as a whole. The methodology is based on the use of secondary sources (such as government reports, policy documents, etc.). The paper contributes to the body of knowledge by cautioning that fiscal decentralization without accountability to the local populace limits the benefit of responsiveness to local needs, while highlighting the importance of local fiscal autonomy on fiscal performance, amongst others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈萨克斯坦财政分权研究
据说,财政分权为公共部门治理提供了许多好处,包括经济增长、问责制和政府官员对当地需求和需要的反应能力。通过中央和地方政府对不同税基的分离控制,增加对收入和支出的自主权,有可能促进地方治理的效率和问责制。哈萨克斯坦是一个单一制国家,所有收入的征收和分配都由中央政府决定。对地区的拨款是根据一定的标准作出的,如面积、人口、该地区对国民经济的重要性等。这意味着地区和地方政府几乎没有动力去设计能够产生内部收入的手段。这给地方官员提供公共服务的缺点提供了一个方便的替罪羊,因为他们可以很容易地把责任推给中央政府。本文的目的是研究如何赋予哈萨克斯坦地区更多的问责制和创收权力,以改善公共服务的提供,并为整个国家带来总体宏观经济绩效和增长。该方法基于二手资料(如政府报告、政策文件等)的使用。本文通过提醒财政分权不向当地民众问责限制了响应当地需求的好处,同时强调了地方财政自治对财政绩效的重要性等,为知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PREDICTING HIGH-GROWTH FIRMS IN KAZAKHSTAN WITH MACHINE LEARNING METHODS ANALYSIS OF GENDER EQUALITY ISSUES IN THE MIDDLE EAST FEATURES OF POLITICAL PROTESTS IN MODERN SOCIETY (THE CASE OF KYRGYZSTAN) THE ARCTIC DIRECTION OF NORWAY'S POLICY: A DOCTRINAL BASIS Local elections 2021: an overview of survey research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1