Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing) and Ethical Space: Ways to Disrupt Health Researchers’ Colonial Attraction to a Singular Biomedical Worldview

Moneca Sinclaire, A. Schultz, J. Linton, Elizabeth A McGibbon
{"title":"Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing) and Ethical Space: Ways to Disrupt Health Researchers’ Colonial Attraction to a Singular Biomedical Worldview","authors":"Moneca Sinclaire, A. Schultz, J. Linton, Elizabeth A McGibbon","doi":"10.25071/2291-5796.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous research on Turtle Island has existed for millennia, where knowledge(s) to work with the land and its inhabitants are available for next generations. These knowledge systems exist today but are rarely viewed as valid biomedical ‘facts’ and so are silenced. When Indigenous knowledge is solicited within health research, the knowledge system is predominantly an ‘add-on’ or is assimilated into Western understandings. We discuss disrupting this colonial state for nurse researchers. Two concepts rooted in Indigenous teachings and knowledges, Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing) and Ethical Space, shed light on ways to disrupt health researchers’ attraction to a singular worldview which continue to privilege Western perspectives. Knowledge rooted in diverse knowledge systems is required to challenge colonial relations in health research and practice. A synergy between Etuaptmumk and Ethical Space can support working with both Indigenous and biomedical knowledge systems in health research and enhance reconciliation.","PeriodicalId":354700,"journal":{"name":"Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-5796.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Indigenous research on Turtle Island has existed for millennia, where knowledge(s) to work with the land and its inhabitants are available for next generations. These knowledge systems exist today but are rarely viewed as valid biomedical ‘facts’ and so are silenced. When Indigenous knowledge is solicited within health research, the knowledge system is predominantly an ‘add-on’ or is assimilated into Western understandings. We discuss disrupting this colonial state for nurse researchers. Two concepts rooted in Indigenous teachings and knowledges, Etuaptmumk (Two-Eyed Seeing) and Ethical Space, shed light on ways to disrupt health researchers’ attraction to a singular worldview which continue to privilege Western perspectives. Knowledge rooted in diverse knowledge systems is required to challenge colonial relations in health research and practice. A synergy between Etuaptmumk and Ethical Space can support working with both Indigenous and biomedical knowledge systems in health research and enhance reconciliation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Etuaptmumk(双眼观察)和伦理空间:扰乱健康研究人员对单一生物医学世界观的殖民吸引力的方法
对海龟岛的土著研究已经存在了几千年,在那里,与土地和居民一起工作的知识可以为下一代提供。这些知识系统今天存在,但很少被视为有效的生物医学“事实”,因此被沉默。当在卫生研究中征求土著知识时,知识体系主要是一种“附加”或被同化为西方的理解。我们为护士研究人员讨论如何打破这种殖民状态。植根于土著教义和知识的两个概念,Etuaptmumk(两只眼睛看)和伦理空间,揭示了如何打破卫生研究人员对单一世界观的吸引力,这种世界观继续以西方观点为特权。要挑战卫生研究和实践中的殖民关系,需要根植于不同知识体系的知识。Etuaptmumk和伦理空间之间的协同作用可以支持在卫生研究中与土著和生物医学知识系统合作,并加强和解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurses - Workforce Commodity, or Autonomous Professionals: What Nurses Know about their Value, Working Conditions, Impacts on Patient Care, and Nursing Practice Concerns Where are they going, and what can we do to keep them? Intent to leave among nurses in British Columbia, Canada Nurses Supporting Harm Reduction: How Take-Home Naloxone is Conceived in the Context of Neoliberalism White privilege and professionalization: a decolonial and critical feminist perspective on professional nursing Nursing in Canada: Broken, but not Beyond Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1