Evaluating the Optimal Number of Clusters to Identify Similar Gene Expression Patterns During Erythropoiesis

H. Saadeh, Maha K. Saadeh, W. Almobaideen, Marwan Al-Tawil
{"title":"Evaluating the Optimal Number of Clusters to Identify Similar Gene Expression Patterns During Erythropoiesis","authors":"H. Saadeh, Maha K. Saadeh, W. Almobaideen, Marwan Al-Tawil","doi":"10.1109/cits55221.2022.9832988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are differentiated into red blood cells (erythrocytes) through a process called Erythropoiesis. During this process, the genes undergo global gene expression changes to reflect the present developmental stage. Unsupervised clustering aims at highlighting the co-expressed genes that share similar expression profiles. Some clustering algorithms, like the well-known and most commonly used K-means, need the number of clusters as input in order to group the data based on similarity measurements. Determining a sufficient number of clusters is not a straightforward task and might be tricky. Furthermore, the quality of the obtained clusters depends on how many clusters were used. In this study, three cluster validation metrics; Silhouette Score, Calinski Harabaz Index, and DaviesBouldin Score were used to evaluate the clusters obtained from the different clustering algorithms applied. For the data of Erythropoiesis, two clusters were identified as sufficient.","PeriodicalId":136239,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Computer, Information and Telecommunication Systems (CITS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/cits55221.2022.9832988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are differentiated into red blood cells (erythrocytes) through a process called Erythropoiesis. During this process, the genes undergo global gene expression changes to reflect the present developmental stage. Unsupervised clustering aims at highlighting the co-expressed genes that share similar expression profiles. Some clustering algorithms, like the well-known and most commonly used K-means, need the number of clusters as input in order to group the data based on similarity measurements. Determining a sufficient number of clusters is not a straightforward task and might be tricky. Furthermore, the quality of the obtained clusters depends on how many clusters were used. In this study, three cluster validation metrics; Silhouette Score, Calinski Harabaz Index, and DaviesBouldin Score were used to evaluate the clusters obtained from the different clustering algorithms applied. For the data of Erythropoiesis, two clusters were identified as sufficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估红细胞生成过程中识别相似基因表达模式的最佳簇数
造血干细胞(HSC)通过红细胞生成的过程分化为红细胞(红细胞)。在这个过程中,基因经历了全局的基因表达变化,以反映当前的发育阶段。无监督聚类旨在突出具有相似表达谱的共表达基因。一些聚类算法,比如众所周知且最常用的K-means,需要簇的数量作为输入,以便根据相似性度量对数据进行分组。确定足够数量的集群并不是一项简单的任务,而且可能很棘手。此外,获得的聚类的质量取决于使用了多少聚类。在本研究中,三个集群验证指标;采用Silhouette Score、Calinski Harabaz Index和DaviesBouldin Score对不同聚类算法得到的聚类进行评价。对于红细胞生成的数据,两个集群被确定为足够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tracking container network connections in a Digital Data Marketplace with P4 Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-based Encryption for Securing IoT Devices in Fog Computing A CNN based localization and activity recognition algorithm using multi-receiver CSI measurements and decision fusion Learning-Automata-Based Energy Efficient Model for Device Lifetime Enhancement in LoRaWAN Networks A Deep Learning Based Bluetooth Indoor Localization Algorithm by RSSI and AOA Feature Fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1