Stewards of the People's Wealth: The Founding of British Columbia's Forest Branch

T. Roach
{"title":"Stewards of the People's Wealth: The Founding of British Columbia's Forest Branch","authors":"T. Roach","doi":"10.2307/4004788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Xthe turn of the century, growing concern over the effects of accelerated forest utilization, forest fire, disease, and other threats to a valuable natural resource prompted the establishment of numerous public forestry agencies throughout the United States and Canada. Initially, such agencies were poorly equipped to handle the important job of forest conservation. Formation of the new state or national forestry services was an exercise in fiscal and bureaucratic restraint; seldom were they given the requisite power to design and implement an effective forestry program. Extending their jurisdiction gradually, such agencies evolved through a period of public debate and sometimes acrimonious bureaucratic wrangling before they achieved maturity as conservators of public resources. In the United States, Chief Forester Gifford Pinchot's fight to transfer administration of the federal forest reserves from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Agriculture is one case in point.' In Canada, Chief Inspector of Timber and Forestry Elihu Stewart likewise struggled for control over cutting on dominion timber berths. At the provincial level, Judson Clark and Bernhard Fernow fought and lost the battle to consolidate powers in Ontario's forestry agency. The British Columbia situation was the exception to this trend. The provincial government had checked the transfer of public forestlands to private cornpanies in 1905, leaving B. C. with one of the highest percentages of commercial forest under government control in the world. The province's Forest Branch, established in 1912, was immediately given jurisdiction over all forestry activity on this immense area of crown (public) land. Relative latecomers to the North American forest conservation movement, British Columbia foresters were not only able to use the experiences of others to justify radical action to curb industrial excesses, but they were able to avoid the pitfalls of developing a forestry system in a region traditionally controlled by private interests operating on public lands. The B. C. forestry situa-","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Xthe turn of the century, growing concern over the effects of accelerated forest utilization, forest fire, disease, and other threats to a valuable natural resource prompted the establishment of numerous public forestry agencies throughout the United States and Canada. Initially, such agencies were poorly equipped to handle the important job of forest conservation. Formation of the new state or national forestry services was an exercise in fiscal and bureaucratic restraint; seldom were they given the requisite power to design and implement an effective forestry program. Extending their jurisdiction gradually, such agencies evolved through a period of public debate and sometimes acrimonious bureaucratic wrangling before they achieved maturity as conservators of public resources. In the United States, Chief Forester Gifford Pinchot's fight to transfer administration of the federal forest reserves from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Agriculture is one case in point.' In Canada, Chief Inspector of Timber and Forestry Elihu Stewart likewise struggled for control over cutting on dominion timber berths. At the provincial level, Judson Clark and Bernhard Fernow fought and lost the battle to consolidate powers in Ontario's forestry agency. The British Columbia situation was the exception to this trend. The provincial government had checked the transfer of public forestlands to private cornpanies in 1905, leaving B. C. with one of the highest percentages of commercial forest under government control in the world. The province's Forest Branch, established in 1912, was immediately given jurisdiction over all forestry activity on this immense area of crown (public) land. Relative latecomers to the North American forest conservation movement, British Columbia foresters were not only able to use the experiences of others to justify radical action to curb industrial excesses, but they were able to avoid the pitfalls of developing a forestry system in a region traditionally controlled by private interests operating on public lands. The B. C. forestry situa-
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《人民财富的管家:不列颠哥伦比亚省森林分局的建立》
在世纪之交,人们越来越关注加速利用森林、森林火灾、疾病和对宝贵自然资源的其他威胁的影响,促使在美国和加拿大各地建立了许多公共林业机构。最初,这些机构在处理森林保护这一重要工作方面装备不足。新的州或国家林业部门的成立是一种财政和官僚约束的做法;他们很少被赋予必要的权力来设计和实施有效的林业计划。这些机构逐渐扩大其管辖范围,经历了一段时间的公开辩论,有时还经历了激烈的官僚争斗,才成为成熟的公共资源保护者。在美国,首席林务官吉福德·平肖(Gifford Pinchot)争取将联邦森林保护区的管理权从内政部移交给农业部就是一个很好的例子。”在加拿大,木材和林业总督察伊莱休·斯图尔特同样为控制对自治州木材泊位的砍伐而斗争。在省一级,贾德森·克拉克(Judson Clark)和伯恩哈德·弗诺(Bernhard Fernow)为巩固安大略省林业局的权力而战,但都失败了。不列颠哥伦比亚省的情况是这一趋势的例外。省政府早在1905年就制止了公共林地向私人公司的转让,使卑诗省成为世界上政府控制下的商业森林比例最高的地区之一。1912年成立的该省森林部门立即被授予对这一大片公有土地上所有林业活动的管辖权。相对于北美森林保护运动的后来者,不列颠哥伦比亚省的护林员不仅能够利用其他人的经验来证明遏制工业过度的激进行动是合理的,而且他们能够避免在一个传统上由私人利益控制的公共土地上发展林业系统的陷阱。公元前林业形势
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Builders of the U.S. Biological Survey, 1885–1930 Brighter and Dimmer Analytic Lights in the Wilderness Bread Forests and New Fields: The Ecology of Reforestation and Forest Clearing among Small-Woodland Owners in Portugal The Many Forms of Outdoor Recreation Lead to Many Books Bill and the Boss: Labor Protest, Technological Change, and the Transformation of the West Coast Logging Camp, 1890–1930
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1