Comparative Study of Wireless Network Simulators

J. Lessmann, P. Janacik, Lazar Lachev, D. Orfanus
{"title":"Comparative Study of Wireless Network Simulators","authors":"J. Lessmann, P. Janacik, Lazar Lachev, D. Orfanus","doi":"10.1109/ICN.2008.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to evaluate the behavior and performance of protocols for wireless networks, simulations are a good compromise between cost and complexity, on the one hand, and accuracy of the results, on the other hand. Since there are many simulators for wireless networks, it is often difficult to decide which simulator to choose. To help shed light on this issue, we present a case study in which four popular wireless network simulators were used to evaluate a well-known topology control protocol (SPAN). Within the case study, we describe outstanding and desirable but missing features of the simulators, outlining their strengths and weaknesses. Further, we compare the amount of effort needed for installation, familiarization, implementation (needed lines of code and lines for configuration) and visualization. As opposed to other simulator comparisons, we do not focus on the correlation of the individual simulation results, but try to compare the simulators from feature and usability point of view. This paper can help other researchers to quickly identify which simulator is most suitable for their needs.","PeriodicalId":250085,"journal":{"name":"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventh International Conference on Networking (icn 2008)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICN.2008.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

In order to evaluate the behavior and performance of protocols for wireless networks, simulations are a good compromise between cost and complexity, on the one hand, and accuracy of the results, on the other hand. Since there are many simulators for wireless networks, it is often difficult to decide which simulator to choose. To help shed light on this issue, we present a case study in which four popular wireless network simulators were used to evaluate a well-known topology control protocol (SPAN). Within the case study, we describe outstanding and desirable but missing features of the simulators, outlining their strengths and weaknesses. Further, we compare the amount of effort needed for installation, familiarization, implementation (needed lines of code and lines for configuration) and visualization. As opposed to other simulator comparisons, we do not focus on the correlation of the individual simulation results, but try to compare the simulators from feature and usability point of view. This paper can help other researchers to quickly identify which simulator is most suitable for their needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无线网络模拟器的比较研究
为了评估无线网络协议的行为和性能,仿真是成本和复杂性与结果准确性之间的一个很好的折衷。由于无线网络有许多模拟器,因此通常很难决定选择哪个模拟器。为了帮助阐明这个问题,我们提出了一个案例研究,其中使用四个流行的无线网络模拟器来评估一个众所周知的拓扑控制协议(SPAN)。在案例研究中,我们描述了模拟器的突出和理想但缺失的功能,概述了它们的优点和缺点。此外,我们还比较了安装、熟悉、实现(所需的代码行数和配置所需的行数)和可视化所需的工作量。与其他模拟器的比较相反,我们不关注单个模拟结果的相关性,而是尝试从功能和可用性的角度来比较模拟器。本文可以帮助其他研究人员快速确定哪种模拟器最适合他们的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Application Layer Multicast for Collaborative Scenarios: The OMCAST Protocol Reduce Time Synchronization Cost for High Latency and Resource-Constrained Sensor Networks Restoration Mechanism for the N2R Topological Routing Algorithm A Hierarchical Game for Uplink CDMA Transmissions with Random Active Users Multicast Voice Transmission over Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks: Issues and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1