The G20 and the Think 20 as new global education policy actors? Discursive analysis of roles and policy ideas

Iván Matovich, Prachi Srivastava
{"title":"The G20 and the Think 20 as new global education policy actors? Discursive analysis of roles and policy ideas","authors":"Iván Matovich, Prachi Srivastava","doi":"10.1108/jice-07-2022-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe Group of Twenty (G20) has substantial influence in global economic policy but has been peripheral in global education governance. There is intensification of education policy-relevant engagement within the Think 20 (T20), the “ideas bank” and official engagement group of the G20. The authors analyse the evolution of education as a policy domain within the T20, the ideas and discursive framing of education and global education policy “solutions” and assumptions about the G20 in education policy engagement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors view the T20 as an external actor that can mobilise policy-relevant ideas to G20 actors responsible for internal policy selection and translation. The analysis covers the period 2018–2021 when education became an explicit T20 policy area. The authors screened all 461 T20 policy briefs across all domains. Of these, 32 briefs and four final T20 Summit communiqués were reviewed using critical discourse analysis. Data were supplemented via organisational websites and tacit professional knowledge.FindingsThree assumptions on the G20 as an actor prevailed: (1) policymaker, (2) policy shaper and (3) knowledge mobiliser. The framing ideas on education were linked to assumptions on drivers of education system reform as intertwined with, or to enable: (1) economic adaptation, (2) technical adaptation and (3) socio-political adaptation of individuals and societies.Originality/valueAccelerated education engagement within the T20 and its direct reach to G20 leaders makes it, and the G20, analytically unique and new unexamined actors of potential influence. The authors conclude that the T20 is positioned as a unique actor, both that can mobilise education policy-relevant ideas to G20 leaders, and legitimised as the actor from which G20 leaders and policymakers should adopt ideas.","PeriodicalId":356133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of international cooperation in education","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of international cooperation in education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jice-07-2022-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe Group of Twenty (G20) has substantial influence in global economic policy but has been peripheral in global education governance. There is intensification of education policy-relevant engagement within the Think 20 (T20), the “ideas bank” and official engagement group of the G20. The authors analyse the evolution of education as a policy domain within the T20, the ideas and discursive framing of education and global education policy “solutions” and assumptions about the G20 in education policy engagement.Design/methodology/approachThe authors view the T20 as an external actor that can mobilise policy-relevant ideas to G20 actors responsible for internal policy selection and translation. The analysis covers the period 2018–2021 when education became an explicit T20 policy area. The authors screened all 461 T20 policy briefs across all domains. Of these, 32 briefs and four final T20 Summit communiqués were reviewed using critical discourse analysis. Data were supplemented via organisational websites and tacit professional knowledge.FindingsThree assumptions on the G20 as an actor prevailed: (1) policymaker, (2) policy shaper and (3) knowledge mobiliser. The framing ideas on education were linked to assumptions on drivers of education system reform as intertwined with, or to enable: (1) economic adaptation, (2) technical adaptation and (3) socio-political adaptation of individuals and societies.Originality/valueAccelerated education engagement within the T20 and its direct reach to G20 leaders makes it, and the G20, analytically unique and new unexamined actors of potential influence. The authors conclude that the T20 is positioned as a unique actor, both that can mobilise education policy-relevant ideas to G20 leaders, and legitimised as the actor from which G20 leaders and policymakers should adopt ideas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
G20和Think 20成为新的全球教育政策参与者?角色和政策思想的话语分析
二十国集团(G20)在全球经济政策中具有重大影响力,但在全球教育治理中却处于边缘地位。在20国集团的“思想库”和官方参与小组“智库”(T20)中,与教育政策相关的参与正在加强。作者分析了G20内部教育作为政策领域的演变、教育的理念和话语框架、全球教育政策“解决方案”以及G20在教育政策参与方面的假设。作者将T20视为一个外部参与者,可以将与政策相关的想法动员到负责内部政策选择和翻译的G20参与者中。该分析涵盖了2018年至2021年期间,教育成为T20明确的政策领域。作者筛选了所有领域的461份T20政策简报。其中,32份简报和4份T20首脑会议公报的最终文件采用批评性话语分析进行了审查。通过组织网站和隐性专业知识补充数据。关于G20作为行动者的三个假设占主导地位:(1)政策制定者,(2)政策塑造者,(3)知识动员者。关于教育的框架思想与教育系统改革驱动因素的假设相关联,这些驱动因素与:(1)经济适应,(2)技术适应,(3)个人和社会的社会政治适应交织在一起。创新/价值20国集团内部加速的教育参与及其与G20领导人的直接接触,使其成为分析上独特的、未经审查的潜在影响力的新参与者。作者的结论是,T20被定位为一个独特的行动者,既可以向G20领导人调动与教育政策相关的想法,又可以成为G20领导人和政策制定者应该采纳的想法的行动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of quality assurance in higher education from INQAAHE GGP to ISGs − Are quality assurance agencies in Asia ready to the emerging modules? Higher education cooperation at the regional level Book review: Shadow Education in the Middle East: Private Supplementary Tutoring and its Policy Implications Birth and evolution of “social studies” in Myanmar: dramatic changes in contents and approaches How did local wisdom and practice make schools thrive during the pandemic? Evidence from a positive deviance study in rural Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1