Mining diabetes database with decision trees and association rules

M. Zorman, G. Masuda, P. Kokol, Ryuichi Yamamoto, B. Stiglic
{"title":"Mining diabetes database with decision trees and association rules","authors":"M. Zorman, G. Masuda, P. Kokol, Ryuichi Yamamoto, B. Stiglic","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2002.1011367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Searching for new rules and new knowledge in problem areas, where very little or almost none previous knowledge is present, can be a very long and demanding process. In our research we addressed the problem of finding new knowledge in the form of rules in the diabetes database using a combination of decision trees and association rules. The first question we wanted to answer was, if there are significant differences in sets of rules both approaches produce, and how rules, produced by decision trees behave, after being a subject of filtering and reduction, normally used in association rule approaches. In order to accomplish that, we had to make some modifications to both the decision tree approach and association rule approach. From the first results we can conclude, that the sets of rules, built by decision trees are much smaller than the sets created by association rules. We could also establish, that filtering and reduction did not effect the rules derived from decision trees in the same scale as association rules.","PeriodicalId":369629,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2002)","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 15th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS 2002)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2002.1011367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Searching for new rules and new knowledge in problem areas, where very little or almost none previous knowledge is present, can be a very long and demanding process. In our research we addressed the problem of finding new knowledge in the form of rules in the diabetes database using a combination of decision trees and association rules. The first question we wanted to answer was, if there are significant differences in sets of rules both approaches produce, and how rules, produced by decision trees behave, after being a subject of filtering and reduction, normally used in association rule approaches. In order to accomplish that, we had to make some modifications to both the decision tree approach and association rule approach. From the first results we can conclude, that the sets of rules, built by decision trees are much smaller than the sets created by association rules. We could also establish, that filtering and reduction did not effect the rules derived from decision trees in the same scale as association rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用决策树和关联规则挖掘糖尿病数据库
在以前很少或几乎没有知识的问题领域中寻找新规则和新知识可能是一个非常漫长且要求很高的过程。在我们的研究中,我们使用决策树和关联规则的组合解决了在糖尿病数据库中以规则形式发现新知识的问题。我们想要回答的第一个问题是,两种方法产生的规则集是否存在显著差异,以及通常用于关联规则方法的过滤和约简之后,决策树产生的规则如何表现。为了实现这一点,我们必须对决策树方法和关联规则方法进行一些修改。从第一个结果我们可以得出结论,由决策树构建的规则集比由关联规则创建的规则集要小得多。我们还可以确定,过滤和约简不会影响与关联规则相同规模的决策树派生的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framework and architecture for the management of event-condition-action (ECA) rule-based clinical protocols Privacy versus safety: who is safe? A software system for giving clues of medical diagnosis to clinician Ensemble feature selection with the simple Bayesian classification in medical diagnostics Distributed data mining from heterogeneous healthcare data repositories: towards an intelligent agent-based framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1