Open think-tank on engineering education: A forum of “face-to-face” debate between stakeholders

B. Gabriel, A. Andrade-Campos, J. Dias-de-Oliveira, R. Valente, V. Neto
{"title":"Open think-tank on engineering education: A forum of “face-to-face” debate between stakeholders","authors":"B. Gabriel, A. Andrade-Campos, J. Dias-de-Oliveira, R. Valente, V. Neto","doi":"10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a model (and the respective guidelines) for the creation of a debate “think-tank” around the thematic of Engineering Education. From this initiative, a first outcome is obtained, in the form of the Engineering Education Forum 2016 (EEF 2016). The Engineering Education Forum is therefore intended to be a place of discussion and debate on this thematic. The model behind Forum encompasses different approaches and tendencies, looking at the past, analysing the present and discussing the future. From the EEF 2016, several outputs and outcomes can be obtained and used for future strategies on Engineering Education. They are presented in this work, the first one focusing on preliminary quantitative results, regarding both the profiles of involved stakeholders and the responses of participants to a number of challenges proposed to the participants of the “face-to-face” debate. The second group of outcomes is related to qualitative aspects, such as the sessions' content and debates, as well as hints for future initiatives following the EEF model.","PeriodicalId":309144,"journal":{"name":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 2nd International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2016.7777744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper describes a model (and the respective guidelines) for the creation of a debate “think-tank” around the thematic of Engineering Education. From this initiative, a first outcome is obtained, in the form of the Engineering Education Forum 2016 (EEF 2016). The Engineering Education Forum is therefore intended to be a place of discussion and debate on this thematic. The model behind Forum encompasses different approaches and tendencies, looking at the past, analysing the present and discussing the future. From the EEF 2016, several outputs and outcomes can be obtained and used for future strategies on Engineering Education. They are presented in this work, the first one focusing on preliminary quantitative results, regarding both the profiles of involved stakeholders and the responses of participants to a number of challenges proposed to the participants of the “face-to-face” debate. The second group of outcomes is related to qualitative aspects, such as the sessions' content and debates, as well as hints for future initiatives following the EEF model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放的工程教育智库:利益相关者之间“面对面”辩论的论坛
本文描述了一个围绕工程教育主题创建辩论“智库”的模型(以及相应的指导方针)。通过这一举措,获得了第一个成果,即2016年工程教育论坛(EEF 2016)。因此,工程教育论坛旨在成为讨论和辩论这一主题的场所。论坛背后的模式包含了不同的方法和趋势,回顾过去,分析现在,讨论未来。从EEF 2016中,可以获得一些产出和成果,并用于未来的工程教育战略。他们在这项工作中提出,第一项工作侧重于初步的定量结果,涉及利益相关者的概况和参与者对“面对面”辩论参与者提出的一些挑战的反应。第二组结果与定性方面有关,例如会议的内容和辩论,以及对遵循EEF模式的未来倡议的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinarity between design and engineering: Case study: The development of a classroom chair for children ages 6–10 Take this Waltz on creativity: The engineering students' conceptions A learning toolkit to promote creative and critical thinking in product design and development through Design Thinking Educating global engineers with EPS@ISEP: The “pet tracker” project experience Portuguese and Brazilian students perceptions regarding the flow of knowledge in their courses: Two different realities?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1