Ethical Procedures in Scientific Research

Liliana Rodrigues
{"title":"Ethical Procedures in Scientific Research","authors":"Liliana Rodrigues","doi":"10.9734/jesbs/2023/v36i71238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work has as its theme the ethical procedures of research and aims to provide a framework of practical guidelines to ensure the protection of all actors involved in the development of scientific knowledge, particularly at the stage of research design and project. \nThis is a theoretical reflection on the ethical dimension of data collection practices and the limits that the researcher should consciously attend to in the scientific research process. For this reflection, I carried out a literature review and a document analysis of several legal documents, highlighting the European directive on data protection. This led to several questions, namely: what documents should be ensured in the research project design process? What is the scope of informed consent and how can anonymity and confidentiality of data be preserved? These and other questions are answered in a thoughtful way for those who understand that there is no science without ethics, nor ethics without conscience. \nHere the hermeneutic method is the natural choice because it allows the interpretation of questions related to values and principles that must be contextualized. This interpretative analysis requires asking questions related to duty, but also to the norm or law. With this questioning it is hoped that the reader will understand in a systematized way the ethical procedures of research and will be able to draw on a documentary listing of the ethical point of view that will protect the informants, but also the researcher himself and affiliating institutions or participants.","PeriodicalId":394178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2023/v36i71238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work has as its theme the ethical procedures of research and aims to provide a framework of practical guidelines to ensure the protection of all actors involved in the development of scientific knowledge, particularly at the stage of research design and project. This is a theoretical reflection on the ethical dimension of data collection practices and the limits that the researcher should consciously attend to in the scientific research process. For this reflection, I carried out a literature review and a document analysis of several legal documents, highlighting the European directive on data protection. This led to several questions, namely: what documents should be ensured in the research project design process? What is the scope of informed consent and how can anonymity and confidentiality of data be preserved? These and other questions are answered in a thoughtful way for those who understand that there is no science without ethics, nor ethics without conscience. Here the hermeneutic method is the natural choice because it allows the interpretation of questions related to values and principles that must be contextualized. This interpretative analysis requires asking questions related to duty, but also to the norm or law. With this questioning it is hoped that the reader will understand in a systematized way the ethical procedures of research and will be able to draw on a documentary listing of the ethical point of view that will protect the informants, but also the researcher himself and affiliating institutions or participants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学研究中的伦理程序
这项工作的主题是研究的伦理程序,旨在提供一个实用指导方针的框架,以确保保护参与科学知识发展的所有行动者,特别是在研究设计和项目阶段。这是对数据收集实践的伦理维度以及研究者在科学研究过程中应自觉注意的限制的理论反思。为此,我对几份法律文件进行了文献回顾和文献分析,重点介绍了欧洲关于数据保护的指令。这导致了几个问题,即:在研究项目设计过程中应该确保哪些文件?知情同意的范围是什么?如何保持数据的匿名性和保密性?对于那些明白没有伦理就没有科学,没有良心就没有伦理的人来说,这些问题和其他问题都得到了深思熟虑的回答。在这里,解释学方法是自然的选择,因为它允许解释与价值观和原则相关的问题,这些问题必须被语境化。这种解释性分析需要提出与责任有关的问题,也需要提出与规范或法律有关的问题。有了这个问题,希望读者能够以一种系统的方式理解研究的伦理程序,并能够利用伦理观点的文献清单,这将保护举报人,也保护研究人员本人和附属机构或参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Values of Integrity in Bhutanese Youth: An Empirical Study Corruption Risks in Differential Taxation on Goods: Insights from Bhutan Trade Statistics and Case Examples Exploring Primary School Pupils’ Career Aspirations in Ibadan, Nigeria: A Qualitative Approach Investigation of the Status of Music Teaching in Middle School under the Background of "Art into the Middle School Entrance Examination" in Dejiang County, China Promoting Intentional Vocabulary Learning among EFL Learners in Saudi Arabia: The Role of Captioned and Subtitled TV Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1