Can graduating students design: revisited

Chris W. Loftus, L. Thomas, Carol Zander
{"title":"Can graduating students design: revisited","authors":"Chris W. Loftus, L. Thomas, Carol Zander","doi":"10.1145/1953163.1953199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we revisit previous research to elaborate on the question: \"Can graduating students design software systems?\" The work concluded that the answer was \"not really\". We wished to determine if this was true currently at our institution and also to look at whether students were able to design software in groups, and evaluate others' designs. In summary, it appears that our students, just as in the original experiment, struggle with doing design, even in a group situation. The representation of behavioral design was particularly lacking. That said, students were able to recognize weaknesses when evaluating other group designs. Based on our findings, we provide several pedagogic recommendations.","PeriodicalId":137934,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

In this paper we revisit previous research to elaborate on the question: "Can graduating students design software systems?" The work concluded that the answer was "not really". We wished to determine if this was true currently at our institution and also to look at whether students were able to design software in groups, and evaluate others' designs. In summary, it appears that our students, just as in the original experiment, struggle with doing design, even in a group situation. The representation of behavioral design was particularly lacking. That said, students were able to recognize weaknesses when evaluating other group designs. Based on our findings, we provide several pedagogic recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毕业生可以重新设计吗
在本文中,我们回顾了以前的研究,详细阐述了这个问题:“毕业生可以设计软件系统吗?”研究得出的结论是,答案是“并非如此”。我们希望确定目前在我们的机构中这是否正确,并且看看学生是否能够分组设计软件,并评估其他人的设计。总之,似乎我们的学生,就像在最初的实验中一样,在做设计时很挣扎,即使是在一个小组的情况下。行为设计的表现尤其缺乏。也就是说,学生们在评估其他小组设计时能够发现弱点。基于我们的发现,我们提供了一些教学建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CodeWrite: supporting student-driven practice of java Computing and music: a spectrum of sound Session details: Panel Applying data structures in exams The use of evidence in the change making process of computer science educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1