Radiological Assessment for Distal Fibular Length

I. Sung, Jong Min Lee
{"title":"Radiological Assessment for Distal Fibular Length","authors":"I. Sung, Jong Min Lee","doi":"10.12671/JKSF.2003.16.2.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was performed to reevaluate the radiological parameters for assessing the length of the distal fibula in the mortise view of the ankle and to introduce a more reliable method to lessen measurement error. Materials and Methods: Mortise view radiographs of 36 normal ankles from 18 healthy volunteers were obtained. The talocrural angle and bimalleolar angle were measured two times and compared bilaterally by two independent observers. Also, The lateral malleolar angle, newly devised in our department was measured and compared bilaterally. Results: The average of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 78.4 degrees (range 74 to 83), 78.3 degrees (range 73 to 86), and 36.7 degrees (range 30 to 41), respectively. The difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle between right and left was 2.1 degrees, 3.0 degrees, and 1.2 degrees (95% confidence limit), respectively. Intraobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, and 0.4 degrees, respectively. Interobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.3 degrees, 2.4 degrees, and 1.0 degrees, respectively. Conclusion: When using various measurement methods to judge the length of the distal fibula, the measurement error should be considered. The proposed method, lateral malleolar angle, would be a good method for assessing the length of distal fibula in the mortise view of ankle.","PeriodicalId":298665,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Fractures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12671/JKSF.2003.16.2.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to reevaluate the radiological parameters for assessing the length of the distal fibula in the mortise view of the ankle and to introduce a more reliable method to lessen measurement error. Materials and Methods: Mortise view radiographs of 36 normal ankles from 18 healthy volunteers were obtained. The talocrural angle and bimalleolar angle were measured two times and compared bilaterally by two independent observers. Also, The lateral malleolar angle, newly devised in our department was measured and compared bilaterally. Results: The average of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 78.4 degrees (range 74 to 83), 78.3 degrees (range 73 to 86), and 36.7 degrees (range 30 to 41), respectively. The difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle between right and left was 2.1 degrees, 3.0 degrees, and 1.2 degrees (95% confidence limit), respectively. Intraobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.5 degrees, 1.6 degrees, and 0.4 degrees, respectively. Interobsever difference of the talocrural angle, bimalleolar angle, and lateral malleolar angle was 1.3 degrees, 2.4 degrees, and 1.0 degrees, respectively. Conclusion: When using various measurement methods to judge the length of the distal fibula, the measurement error should be considered. The proposed method, lateral malleolar angle, would be a good method for assessing the length of distal fibula in the mortise view of ankle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腓骨远端长度的影像学评估
目的:本研究旨在重新评估踝关节榫槽位下评估腓骨远端长度的放射学参数,并介绍一种更可靠的方法来减少测量误差。材料与方法:获取18例健康志愿者36例正常踝关节的榫眼透视片。两名独立观测者分别测量距踝角和双踝角两次,并进行双侧比较。同时对我科新设计的外踝角进行了双侧测量和比较。结果:距踝角、双踝角和外踝角的平均值分别为78.4°(范围74 ~ 83)、78.3°(范围73 ~ 86)和36.7°(范围30 ~ 41)。左右距踝角、双踝角和外踝角的差异分别为2.1度、3.0度和1.2度(95%置信限)。距踝角、双踝角和外踝角的观察内差分别为1.5°、1.6°和0.4°。距踝角、双踝角和外踝角的观察间差异分别为1.3°、2.4°和1.0°。结论:采用各种测量方法判断腓骨远端长度时,应考虑测量误差。所提出的方法,外踝角,将是评估远端腓骨长度的一个很好的方法,在踝关节的榫槽视图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Failures of Union of the Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures Surgical Treatment of Internal Malleolar Fracture of the Ankle: Rush Rod Versus Plate Osteosynthesis Treatment of Infected Nonunion of Long Bone Shaft: Comparison between Fixation by Antibiotic-cement Loaded Intramedullary Nailing and Fixation by Antibiotic-cement Loaded External Monofixator Treatment of Completely Displaced Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus in Children. Arthroscopic-Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation of Patella Fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1