Predicting total energy expenditure from self-reported dietary records and physical characteristics in adult and elderly men and women.

J. Seale
{"title":"Predicting total energy expenditure from self-reported dietary records and physical characteristics in adult and elderly men and women.","authors":"J. Seale","doi":"10.1093/AJCN/76.3.529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nEnergy requirements and nutrient intakes are commonly estimated from self-reported dietary records, but such estimation has proven to be unreliable. When energy intakes determined from dietary records are compared with energy expenditures measured with the use of doubly labeled water, the former consistently underestimate energy requirements and have a high degree of variability.\n\n\nOBJECTIVE\nThe objective of this study was to reduce the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records through the use of stepwise multiple regression analysis to develop models that relate energy expenditure measured with the use of doubly labeled water to energy intake from dietary records, sex, and fat-free mass (or weight and height).\n\n\nDESIGN\nData from 54 healthy adult men and women were used to develop these models.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFat-free mass, energy intake, and sex accounted for 86% of the variability in energy expenditure, whereas energy intake, sex, height, and weight accounted for 83%. When the model relating fat-free mass, energy intake, and sex to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -17 +/- 27% to 3 +/- 16%. When the model relating energy intake, sex, weight, and height to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -19 +/- 25% to -0.3 +/- 19%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nResults from this study indicate that a simple relation can be used to correct self-reported dietary records to estimated energy requirements.","PeriodicalId":315016,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of clinical nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCN/76.3.529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

BACKGROUND Energy requirements and nutrient intakes are commonly estimated from self-reported dietary records, but such estimation has proven to be unreliable. When energy intakes determined from dietary records are compared with energy expenditures measured with the use of doubly labeled water, the former consistently underestimate energy requirements and have a high degree of variability. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to reduce the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records through the use of stepwise multiple regression analysis to develop models that relate energy expenditure measured with the use of doubly labeled water to energy intake from dietary records, sex, and fat-free mass (or weight and height). DESIGN Data from 54 healthy adult men and women were used to develop these models. RESULTS Fat-free mass, energy intake, and sex accounted for 86% of the variability in energy expenditure, whereas energy intake, sex, height, and weight accounted for 83%. When the model relating fat-free mass, energy intake, and sex to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -17 +/- 27% to 3 +/- 16%. When the model relating energy intake, sex, weight, and height to energy expenditure was tested on published data, it reduced the bias and variability of self-reported dietary records from -19 +/- 25% to -0.3 +/- 19%. CONCLUSION Results from this study indicate that a simple relation can be used to correct self-reported dietary records to estimated energy requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从自我报告的饮食记录和身体特征预测成年和老年男性和女性的总能量消耗。
能量需求和营养摄入通常是根据自我报告的饮食记录来估计的,但这种估计已被证明是不可靠的。当将从饮食记录中确定的能量摄入与使用双标签水测量的能量消耗进行比较时,前者始终低估了能量需求,并且具有高度的可变性。本研究的目的是通过使用逐步多元回归分析来建立模型,将使用双标签水测量的能量消耗与饮食记录、性别和无脂质量(或体重和身高)的能量摄入联系起来,以减少自我报告饮食记录的偏差和可变性。来自54名健康成年男性和女性的数据用于开发这些模型。结果无脂质量、能量摄入和性别占能量消耗变异的86%,能量摄入、性别、身高和体重占83%。当将无脂质量、能量摄入和性别与能量消耗相关的模型在已发表的数据上进行测试时,它将自我报告的饮食记录的偏差和可变性从-17 +/- 27%降低到3 +/- 16%。当将能量摄入、性别、体重和身高与能量消耗相关的模型在已发表的数据上进行测试时,它将自我报告的饮食记录的偏差和可变性从-19 +/- 25%降低到-0.3 +/- 19%。结论本研究结果表明,一个简单的关系可以用来纠正自我报告的饮食记录和估计的能量需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators to diagnose malnutrition tool in hospitalized adults: a cohort study Chronic and postprandial effect of blueberries on cognitive function, alertness, and mood in participants with metabolic syndrome – results from a six-month, double-blind, randomized controlled trial Cognition after a 4-week high phenylalanine intake in adults with phenylketonuria – a randomized controlled trial Monitoring Body Composition Change for Intervention Studies with Advancing 3D Optical Imaging Technology in Comparison to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Preventive small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements reduce severe wasting and severe stunting among young children: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1