Time Response Analysis of Novel Helical Capacitance Level Sensor

2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER) Pub Date : 2020-10-30 DOI:10.1109/DISCOVER50404.2020.9278051

J. R. Hanni, S. V

{"title":"Time Response Analysis of Novel Helical Capacitance Level Sensor","authors":"J. R. Hanni, S. V","doi":"10.1109/DISCOVER50404.2020.9278051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response time is one of the important characteristics of the Capacitance Level Sensor (CLS). It is defined by the time taken for the sensor to respond with respect to change in liquid level. This paper deals with response time analysis as it is related to the steady and dynamic state of the system. Sensor response characteristics alter with respect to steady and dynamic state. Steady and dynamic state of the system is achieved by changing the flow rate of liquid into the process tank. The main objective of the paper is to analyse the steady and dynamic characteristics of novel helical CLS. The results of novel helical CLS of steady and dynamic state is compared with parallel rod and cylindrical CLS. Results show that helical CLS responds quicker as compared to that of parallel rod and cylindrical CLS in both the state analysis because of its novel electrode structure, which easily allows liquid to flow in between the electrodes. Helical CLS responds within 6.89 s, parallel responds by 13.35 s and cylindrical responds by 34.62 s in steady state analysis. Three cases are considered for analysis in dynamic state. Helical CLS shows faster responses in all the three cases as compared to that of other two CLS.","PeriodicalId":131517,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DISCOVER50404.2020.9278051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Response time is one of the important characteristics of the Capacitance Level Sensor (CLS). It is defined by the time taken for the sensor to respond with respect to change in liquid level. This paper deals with response time analysis as it is related to the steady and dynamic state of the system. Sensor response characteristics alter with respect to steady and dynamic state. Steady and dynamic state of the system is achieved by changing the flow rate of liquid into the process tank. The main objective of the paper is to analyse the steady and dynamic characteristics of novel helical CLS. The results of novel helical CLS of steady and dynamic state is compared with parallel rod and cylindrical CLS. Results show that helical CLS responds quicker as compared to that of parallel rod and cylindrical CLS in both the state analysis because of its novel electrode structure, which easily allows liquid to flow in between the electrodes. Helical CLS responds within 6.89 s, parallel responds by 13.35 s and cylindrical responds by 34.62 s in steady state analysis. Three cases are considered for analysis in dynamic state. Helical CLS shows faster responses in all the three cases as compared to that of other two CLS.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

新型螺旋电容式液位传感器的时间响应分析

响应时间是电容式液位传感器(CLS)的重要特性之一。它是由传感器对液位变化作出响应所花费的时间来定义的。响应时间分析关系到系统的稳态和动态。传感器响应特性随稳态和动态变化而变化。通过改变进入工艺槽的液体流量来实现系统的稳态和动态。本文的主要目的是分析新型螺旋CLS的稳态和动态特性。并与平行杆式和圆柱式超压系统的稳态和动态结果进行了比较。结果表明，由于螺旋CLS具有新颖的电极结构，易于液体在电极之间流动，因此在两种状态分析中，螺旋CLS的响应速度都快于平行棒和圆柱形CLS。在稳态分析中，螺旋CLS响应时间为6.89 s，平行响应时间为13.35 s，圆柱响应时间为34.62 s。考虑了三种情况进行了动态分析。与其他两种CLS相比，螺旋CLS在三种情况下均表现出更快的反应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

2020 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER)

自引率

0.00%

发文量