Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies

Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, B. Roh
{"title":"Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies","authors":"Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, B. Roh","doi":"10.1145/3209914.3209931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.","PeriodicalId":174382,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3209914.3209931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同SDN拓扑下POX和Ryu的性能分析
本文讨论了两种基于python的软件定义网络(SDN)控制器(即POX和Ryu)在不同网络拓扑下的性能比较,如单、线性、树、哑铃、数据中心网络(DCN)和使用卫星通信系统(SATCOM)即SDN- sat的软件定义海军网络[1]。通过Mininet验证的实验结果清楚地表明,Ryu在单拓扑、线性拓扑、树拓扑、哑铃拓扑和DCN拓扑下,TCP吞吐量分别提高了25.56%、282.54%、44.85%、19.88%、45.45%,时延分别降低了93.48%、99.96%、99.90%、97.08%、99.33%。同样,在SDN-SAT拓扑中,Ryu与POX控制器相比,TCP吞吐量增加了0.21%,延迟减少了34.62%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Implementation of Student Information Management System Based On Java Improving RealSense by Fusing Color Stereo Vision and Infrared Stereo Vision for the Visually Impaired Expert Recommendation Based on Collaborative Filtering in Subject Research An Approach for Information Discovery Using Ontology In Semantic Web Content Detecting Phone Theft Using Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1