Mapping Human Reason

A. McGrath
{"title":"Mapping Human Reason","authors":"A. McGrath","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198813101.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the ‘maps’ of human reason, focussing on how different academic disciplines work with different—and often divergent—notions of rationality. Particular attention is paid to ‘scientism’—the view that the natural sciences are the ultimate rational authority. Attention then turns to interdisciplinary issues, focussing on the relation of science and religion; and the notion and location of a boundary between science and religion are examined. The chapter explores the ideas that these two fields might represent different perspectives on reality, or that they can be seen as engaging different levels of reality. Noting how concepts of rationality and their associated practices vary according to their cultural and disciplinary context, various accounts of the relation between science and religion are considered as potential frameworks for understanding how they might engage in a meaningful dialogue.","PeriodicalId":129700,"journal":{"name":"The Territories of Human Reason","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Territories of Human Reason","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198813101.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter looks at the ‘maps’ of human reason, focussing on how different academic disciplines work with different—and often divergent—notions of rationality. Particular attention is paid to ‘scientism’—the view that the natural sciences are the ultimate rational authority. Attention then turns to interdisciplinary issues, focussing on the relation of science and religion; and the notion and location of a boundary between science and religion are examined. The chapter explores the ideas that these two fields might represent different perspectives on reality, or that they can be seen as engaging different levels of reality. Noting how concepts of rationality and their associated practices vary according to their cultural and disciplinary context, various accounts of the relation between science and religion are considered as potential frameworks for understanding how they might engage in a meaningful dialogue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制人类理性
本章着眼于人类理性的“地图”,重点关注不同的学科如何与不同的(通常是分歧的)理性概念一起工作。其中特别关注的是“科学主义”,即认为自然科学是终极理性权威的观点。然后注意力转向跨学科问题,集中在科学与宗教的关系上;科学和宗教之间的界限的概念和位置进行了检查。本章探讨了这两个领域可能代表现实的不同观点,或者它们可以被视为涉及现实的不同层面。注意到理性的概念及其相关实践如何根据其文化和学科背景而变化,对科学与宗教之间关系的各种描述被认为是理解它们如何参与有意义对话的潜在框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rational Consilience Rational Explanation in Science and Religion One Reason; Multiple Rationalities Complexity and Mystery Rational Virtues and the Problem of Theory Choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1