Vacuum-Assisted Closure for Sternal Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

H. Erdem, Ayse Karakoc, Seda Karasakal, Yeliz Karacı, A. Antal, H. Sunar
{"title":"Vacuum-Assisted Closure for Sternal Wound Infection After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery","authors":"H. Erdem, Ayse Karakoc, Seda Karasakal, Yeliz Karacı, A. Antal, H. Sunar","doi":"10.51645/KHJ.2021.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Vacuum-assisted closure of sternal infected wounds has been reported to improve morbidity and mortality, besides decreasing duration of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure of infected sternal wounds after coronary bypass surgery in our clinic. Patients and Methods: Sixty six patients who had sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery in our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were included in the study. After surgical debridement and removal of foreign materials, vacuum-assisted closure therapy was initiated at a mean postoperative 26.56 ± 5.5 days. After wound healing and negative cultures, treatment was terminated and sternal wounds were closed with appropriate procedures. Results: Fifty six patients (84.84%) had deep sternal infection and 10 patients (15.15%) had superficial sternal infection. Early mortality was 13.63% (nine patients), all having deep sternal infections. The most common microorganisms cultured were Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mean duration of hospitalization was 39.68 ± 2.48 days. No complications related with vacuum-assisted closure were detected. Recurrent sternal wound infection was not observed in any of the surviving patients. Conclusion: Our results confirm that vacuum-assisted closure of wounds is a safe and effective treatment option for patients who are not candidates for primary closure or early muscle flap closure.","PeriodicalId":239985,"journal":{"name":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51645/KHJ.2021.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Vacuum-assisted closure of sternal infected wounds has been reported to improve morbidity and mortality, besides decreasing duration of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to evaluate early outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure of infected sternal wounds after coronary bypass surgery in our clinic. Patients and Methods: Sixty six patients who had sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery in our hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 were included in the study. After surgical debridement and removal of foreign materials, vacuum-assisted closure therapy was initiated at a mean postoperative 26.56 ± 5.5 days. After wound healing and negative cultures, treatment was terminated and sternal wounds were closed with appropriate procedures. Results: Fifty six patients (84.84%) had deep sternal infection and 10 patients (15.15%) had superficial sternal infection. Early mortality was 13.63% (nine patients), all having deep sternal infections. The most common microorganisms cultured were Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mean duration of hospitalization was 39.68 ± 2.48 days. No complications related with vacuum-assisted closure were detected. Recurrent sternal wound infection was not observed in any of the surviving patients. Conclusion: Our results confirm that vacuum-assisted closure of wounds is a safe and effective treatment option for patients who are not candidates for primary closure or early muscle flap closure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉搭桥术后胸骨伤口感染的真空封闭治疗
导读:据报道,真空辅助封闭胸骨感染伤口不仅可以减少住院时间,还可以提高发病率和死亡率。本研究的目的是评估真空辅助封闭冠状动脉搭桥术后感染胸骨伤口的早期结果。患者与方法:选取2016年1月至2019年12月在我院行冠状动脉搭桥术后发生胸骨伤口感染的患者66例。在手术清创和清除异物后,平均术后26.56±5.5天开始进行真空辅助闭合治疗。在伤口愈合和阴性培养后,终止治疗并按适当程序关闭胸骨伤口。结果:56例(84.84%)胸骨深部感染,10例(15.15%)胸骨浅表感染。早期死亡率为13.63%(9例),均为深部胸骨感染。最常见的微生物培养为金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。平均住院时间39.68±2.48 d。未发现与真空辅助闭合相关的并发症。存活患者无复发性胸骨伤口感染。结论:我们的研究结果证实了真空辅助伤口闭合是一种安全有效的治疗选择,对于那些不适合初次闭合或早期肌肉瓣闭合的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictive Value of Post-operative Cardiac Troponin I and Lactate Levels After Ventricular Septal Defect Closure Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life Following TEVAR with or without Revascularization of the Left Subclavian Artery Distal Versus Proximal Radial Intervention; Is It Really Worth of It? What Did the Latest Updated Pulmonary Hypertension Guide Bring? Current Position and Future Perspectives of Melatonin and Its Supplements in Pulmonary Hypertension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1