Unsur Melawan Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sarana Dalam Delik Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Tipikor

M. R. Lubis, Halimatul Maryani, Cut Nurita
{"title":"Unsur Melawan Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sarana Dalam Delik Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Tipikor","authors":"M. R. Lubis, Halimatul Maryani, Cut Nurita","doi":"10.33319/yume.v5i1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In all of the regulations, unless the Act No. 24 / Prp / 1960, the definition of 'unlawful' means has a broad meaning, namely in terms of formal (formele wederrechtelijkheid) and in terms of material (materiele wederrechtelijkheid), without distinguishing function is positive or negative function. This can be seen in the general explanation of these various regulations, as well as according to general explanations PTPK the existing laws in addition to an explanation related to Article 2 paragraph (1), as disampaikansebelumnya.Dalam its development in the future, the interpretation of \"lawful\" in the sense of material with positive function, which expanded the scope of the formulation of the offense, questioned and denied. In the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 003 / PUU-IV / 2006 dated July 25, 2006, The Court considered that the explanation of Article 2 (1) it is contrary to the 1945 Constitution, because it creates legal uncertainty. The Court held that Article 28 D of paragraph (1) to protect the constitutional rights of citizens to obtain insurance and legal protection in criminal law certainly is translated as the principle of legality. This principle requires that the formulation of an action, so it can be regarded as a criminal offense, shall be set forth in the written rules beforehand. The Court then stated that the interpretation of the meaning of 'unlawfully' in the explanation of Article 2 (1) was not legally binding. Since then, comes back the difference of perception between the law enforcement agencies in understanding the interpretation of the element of \"lawful\" in the sense of material as described above, so the application of Article 2 (1) that would lead to legal uncertainty and injustice. Although this provision is widely used, the interpretation of the element of \"lawful\" in the practice of handling corruption cases in court Corruption (corruption) turned out to show their inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":339930,"journal":{"name":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v5i1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In all of the regulations, unless the Act No. 24 / Prp / 1960, the definition of 'unlawful' means has a broad meaning, namely in terms of formal (formele wederrechtelijkheid) and in terms of material (materiele wederrechtelijkheid), without distinguishing function is positive or negative function. This can be seen in the general explanation of these various regulations, as well as according to general explanations PTPK the existing laws in addition to an explanation related to Article 2 paragraph (1), as disampaikansebelumnya.Dalam its development in the future, the interpretation of "lawful" in the sense of material with positive function, which expanded the scope of the formulation of the offense, questioned and denied. In the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 003 / PUU-IV / 2006 dated July 25, 2006, The Court considered that the explanation of Article 2 (1) it is contrary to the 1945 Constitution, because it creates legal uncertainty. The Court held that Article 28 D of paragraph (1) to protect the constitutional rights of citizens to obtain insurance and legal protection in criminal law certainly is translated as the principle of legality. This principle requires that the formulation of an action, so it can be regarded as a criminal offense, shall be set forth in the written rules beforehand. The Court then stated that the interpretation of the meaning of 'unlawfully' in the explanation of Article 2 (1) was not legally binding. Since then, comes back the difference of perception between the law enforcement agencies in understanding the interpretation of the element of "lawful" in the sense of material as described above, so the application of Article 2 (1) that would lead to legal uncertainty and injustice. Although this provision is widely used, the interpretation of the element of "lawful" in the practice of handling corruption cases in court Corruption (corruption) turned out to show their inconsistency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在所有条例中,除第24 / Prp / 1960号法令外,“非法”手段的定义具有广泛的含义,即就形式(formele wederrechtelijkheid)和就材料(materiele wederrechtelijkheid)而言,没有区分功能是积极功能还是消极功能。这可以从这些各种条例的总解释中看出,以及根据PTPK的总解释,除了与第2条第(1)款有关的解释外,还包括disampaikansebelumnya。在其今后的发展中,对“合法”物质意义上的解释具有积极的作用,这扩大了对犯罪的制定范围,提出了质疑和否定。在2006年7月25日第003 / PUU-IV / 2006号宪法法院的决定中,法院认为对第2(1)条的解释违反了1945年宪法,因为它造成了法律上的不确定性。法院认为,第28条D款第(1)项保护公民获得保险和法律保护的宪法权利在刑法中当然可以翻译为合法性原则。这一原则要求,构成刑事犯罪的行为,应当事先在书面规则中作出规定。法院随后指出,对第2(1)条的解释中对“非法”一词含义的解释没有法律约束力。此后,又回到了执法机构在理解上述材料意义上的“合法”要素的解释方面的看法差异,因此第2(1)条的适用将导致法律上的不确定性和不公正。虽然这一条款被广泛使用,但在法庭审理腐败案件的实践中,对“合法”要素的解释却显示出不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Hukum Bagi Pekerja Kontrak Yang Di Phk Sebelum Masa Kontrak Berakhir Menurut Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Otonomi Daerah Dalam Perspektif Pancasila Eksistensi Pasal 14 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi No.31 Tahun 1999 Jo Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2001 Terhadap Praktek Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dalam Dimensi Cyber Crime (Studi Kasus Polres Kota Palu) Perlindungan Hukum Rumah Sakit Yang Belum Memenuhi Kelas Rawat Inap Standar JKN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1