Towards a Substantive Theory of Decision-Making in Software Project Management: Preliminary Findings from a Qualitative Study

J. A. O. G. Cunha, F. Silva, H. Moura, Francisco J. S. Vasconcellos
{"title":"Towards a Substantive Theory of Decision-Making in Software Project Management: Preliminary Findings from a Qualitative Study","authors":"J. A. O. G. Cunha, F. Silva, H. Moura, Francisco J. S. Vasconcellos","doi":"10.1145/2961111.2962604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: In software project management, the decision-making process is a complex set of tasks largely based on human relations and individual knowledge and cultural background. The factors that affect the decisions of the software project managers (SPMs) as well as their potential consequences require attention because project delays and failures might be related to a series of poor decisions. Goals: To understand how SPMs make decisions based on how they interpret their experiences in the workplace. Further, to identify antecedents and consequences of those decisions in order to increase the effectiveness of project management. We also aim to refine the research design for future investigations. Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with SPMs within a Brazilian large governmental organization and a Brazilian large private organization. Results: We found that decision-making in software project management is based on knowledge sharing in which the SPM acts as a facilitator. This phenomenon is influenced by individual factors, such as experience, knowledge, personality, organizational ability, communication, negotiation, interpersonal relationship and systemic vision of the project and by situational factors such as the autonomy of the SPM, constant feedback and team members' technical competence. Conclusions: Due to the uncertainty and dynamism inherent to software projects, the SPMs focus on making, monitoring and adjusting decisions in an argument-driven way. From the initial relationships among the identified factors, the research design was refined.","PeriodicalId":208212,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Context: In software project management, the decision-making process is a complex set of tasks largely based on human relations and individual knowledge and cultural background. The factors that affect the decisions of the software project managers (SPMs) as well as their potential consequences require attention because project delays and failures might be related to a series of poor decisions. Goals: To understand how SPMs make decisions based on how they interpret their experiences in the workplace. Further, to identify antecedents and consequences of those decisions in order to increase the effectiveness of project management. We also aim to refine the research design for future investigations. Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with SPMs within a Brazilian large governmental organization and a Brazilian large private organization. Results: We found that decision-making in software project management is based on knowledge sharing in which the SPM acts as a facilitator. This phenomenon is influenced by individual factors, such as experience, knowledge, personality, organizational ability, communication, negotiation, interpersonal relationship and systemic vision of the project and by situational factors such as the autonomy of the SPM, constant feedback and team members' technical competence. Conclusions: Due to the uncertainty and dynamism inherent to software projects, the SPMs focus on making, monitoring and adjusting decisions in an argument-driven way. From the initial relationships among the identified factors, the research design was refined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向软件项目管理决策的实体理论:一项定性研究的初步发现
背景:在软件项目管理中,决策过程是一组复杂的任务,主要基于人际关系、个人知识和文化背景。需要注意影响软件项目经理(SPMs)决策的因素以及它们的潜在后果,因为项目延迟和失败可能与一系列糟糕的决策有关。目标:了解spm如何根据他们如何解释他们在工作场所的经历做出决策。进一步,确定这些决策的前提和结果,以提高项目管理的有效性。我们还旨在为未来的研究完善研究设计。方法:对巴西大型政府组织和巴西大型私人组织的spm进行半结构化访谈。结果:我们发现软件项目管理中的决策是基于知识共享的,其中SPM充当促进者。这种现象受到个人因素的影响,如经验、知识、个性、组织能力、沟通、谈判、人际关系和项目的系统性愿景,也受到情景因素的影响,如SPM的自主性、持续的反馈和团队成员的技术能力。结论:由于软件项目固有的不确定性和动态性,spm关注于以论证驱动的方式制定、监控和调整决策。从确定的因素之间的初始关系出发,对研究设计进行了细化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence Briefings: Towards a Medium to Transfer Knowledge from Systematic Reviews to Practitioners The Obscure Process of Innovation Assessment: A Report of an Industrial Survey Sustainable Software Development through Overlapping Pair Rotation DIGS: A Framework for Discovering Goals for Security Requirements Engineering The Impact of Task Granularity on Co-evolution Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1