Silicose

Mónica Santos, A. Almeida, Catarina Lopes
{"title":"Silicose","authors":"Mónica Santos, A. Almeida, Catarina Lopes","doi":"10.31252/rpso.25.06.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction/framework/objectives Pneumoconiosis are the most frequent occupational diseases. Silicosis is caused by inhaling breathable crystalline Silica. It is a diffuse interstitial fibronodular lung disease. Initially it is asymptomatic, however, it is usually progressive and without cure. The diagnosis is partially based on a history of professional exposure. It is more prevalent in countries with considerable unemployment and/or little or no Health and Safety Surveillance at Work. Methodology This is a Bibliographic Review, initiated through a search carried out in January 2022, in the databases “CINALH plus with full text, Medline with full text, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, Nursing and Allied Health Collection: comprehensive, MedicLatina and RCAAP”. Contents Silica or silicon dioxide (SiO2) is made up of oxygen and silicon. In nature it exists in amorphous and crystalline forms. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) considered inhaled crystalline Silica as a human carcinogen (group 1), probably due to cellular damage, inflammation, oxidative stress and inhibition of clearance. Amorphous silica is not considered carcinogenic to humans (group 3). Silicosis exists in all countries, but is more prevalent in the ones less developed, even realizing that the real incidence should be higher than the official one, due to the situation being underreported. In more developed countries, the incidence/prevalence has decreased, due to the improvement of working conditions. Exposure is relevant via inhalation; cutaneous and digestive tracts generally do not have important consequences in the work context. The health risk varies with concentration, particle size– diameter, surface and shape (more dangerous if smaller), exposure time, type of silica (crystalline, tridymite and cristobalite are the most harmful, although more rare), density, water and lipid solubility, chemical reactivity, hygroscopic and electrostatic character, temperature, air speed and employee physical activity. Also important are gender, body area, age, general health status, previous pathologies and smoking- that is, individual susceptibility. The particles can be inhaled, thoracic or respirable (the latter are able to settle in the lungs). The shape, size and density of dust will affect the behavior and penetration into the respiratory system. The respirable fraction consists of particles smaller than 10 micrometers, that is, they can reach the area where gas exchange takes place; larger than that, they are usually deposited in the nasal and thoracic region. Silica nanoparticles smaller than 100 nanometers can reach the bloodstream. After inhalation, Silica particles are mainly deposited in the bronchioles and alveoli; if mucociliary clearance is not sufficient, inflammation (alveolitis) develops, which can lead to fibrosis and cancer. Macrophage activation generates free radicals/reactive oxygen species, which are not always attenuated by anti-oxidant defenses. Continued exposure enhances the release of cytokines which, in turn, activate more macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes; the increased production of collagen will then lead to said fibrosis, decreasing lung profitability and efficiency; that is, decreasing gas exchange; being that it can also reach the pleura. Discussion and Conclusions Despite the advances provided by an increasingly effective Health and Safety system, Silicosis is still a problem in some contexts, so it is necessary that the professionals working in these teams have reasonable knowledge regarding the sectors/tasks where it can occur, auxiliary diagnostic tests and other surveillance parameters, collective and individual protection measures, as well as possible implications for the classification of aptitude to work. It would be relevant to better understand the national scenario, through the dissemination of investigations carried out in this context. KEYWORDS: silica, silicosis, safety at work, occupational health and occupational medicine.","PeriodicalId":114994,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Ocupacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31252/rpso.25.06.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction/framework/objectives Pneumoconiosis are the most frequent occupational diseases. Silicosis is caused by inhaling breathable crystalline Silica. It is a diffuse interstitial fibronodular lung disease. Initially it is asymptomatic, however, it is usually progressive and without cure. The diagnosis is partially based on a history of professional exposure. It is more prevalent in countries with considerable unemployment and/or little or no Health and Safety Surveillance at Work. Methodology This is a Bibliographic Review, initiated through a search carried out in January 2022, in the databases “CINALH plus with full text, Medline with full text, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Methodology Register, Nursing and Allied Health Collection: comprehensive, MedicLatina and RCAAP”. Contents Silica or silicon dioxide (SiO2) is made up of oxygen and silicon. In nature it exists in amorphous and crystalline forms. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) considered inhaled crystalline Silica as a human carcinogen (group 1), probably due to cellular damage, inflammation, oxidative stress and inhibition of clearance. Amorphous silica is not considered carcinogenic to humans (group 3). Silicosis exists in all countries, but is more prevalent in the ones less developed, even realizing that the real incidence should be higher than the official one, due to the situation being underreported. In more developed countries, the incidence/prevalence has decreased, due to the improvement of working conditions. Exposure is relevant via inhalation; cutaneous and digestive tracts generally do not have important consequences in the work context. The health risk varies with concentration, particle size– diameter, surface and shape (more dangerous if smaller), exposure time, type of silica (crystalline, tridymite and cristobalite are the most harmful, although more rare), density, water and lipid solubility, chemical reactivity, hygroscopic and electrostatic character, temperature, air speed and employee physical activity. Also important are gender, body area, age, general health status, previous pathologies and smoking- that is, individual susceptibility. The particles can be inhaled, thoracic or respirable (the latter are able to settle in the lungs). The shape, size and density of dust will affect the behavior and penetration into the respiratory system. The respirable fraction consists of particles smaller than 10 micrometers, that is, they can reach the area where gas exchange takes place; larger than that, they are usually deposited in the nasal and thoracic region. Silica nanoparticles smaller than 100 nanometers can reach the bloodstream. After inhalation, Silica particles are mainly deposited in the bronchioles and alveoli; if mucociliary clearance is not sufficient, inflammation (alveolitis) develops, which can lead to fibrosis and cancer. Macrophage activation generates free radicals/reactive oxygen species, which are not always attenuated by anti-oxidant defenses. Continued exposure enhances the release of cytokines which, in turn, activate more macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes; the increased production of collagen will then lead to said fibrosis, decreasing lung profitability and efficiency; that is, decreasing gas exchange; being that it can also reach the pleura. Discussion and Conclusions Despite the advances provided by an increasingly effective Health and Safety system, Silicosis is still a problem in some contexts, so it is necessary that the professionals working in these teams have reasonable knowledge regarding the sectors/tasks where it can occur, auxiliary diagnostic tests and other surveillance parameters, collective and individual protection measures, as well as possible implications for the classification of aptitude to work. It would be relevant to better understand the national scenario, through the dissemination of investigations carried out in this context. KEYWORDS: silica, silicosis, safety at work, occupational health and occupational medicine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Silicose
尘肺病是最常见的职业病。矽肺病是由吸入可呼吸的结晶二氧化硅引起的。它是一种弥漫性间质性纤维结节性肺病。最初它是无症状的,然而,它通常是渐进的,无法治愈。诊断部分基于职业暴露史。在失业率高和(或)很少或没有工作场所健康和安全监督的国家,这种情况更为普遍。这是一篇文献综述,于2022年1月在“CINALH plus全文、Medline全文、效果评价摘要数据库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane方法学注册库、护理和联合健康Collection: comprehensive、MedicLatina和RCAAP”数据库中进行检索。二氧化硅(SiO2)由氧和硅组成。在自然界中,它以无定形和结晶的形式存在。国际癌症研究机构(IARC)认为吸入结晶二氧化硅是人类致癌物(1类),可能是由于细胞损伤、炎症、氧化应激和清除抑制。无定形二氧化硅不被认为对人类有致癌性(第3组)。矽肺病在所有国家都存在,但在欠发达国家更为普遍,甚至意识到实际发病率应该高于官方公布的发病率,因为情况被低估了。在较发达的国家,由于工作条件的改善,发病率/流行率已经下降。通过吸入接触是相关的;皮肤和消化道通常在工作环境中没有重要的影响。健康风险因浓度、颗粒大小-直径、表面和形状(越小越危险)、暴露时间、二氧化硅类型(晶体、钇铝石和方石石是最有害的,尽管更罕见)、密度、水和脂溶性、化学反应性、吸湿性和静电特性、温度、空气速度和员工体力活动而异。同样重要的还有性别、身体面积、年龄、一般健康状况、以前的疾病和吸烟情况——即个人易感性。颗粒可被吸入,胸部或可呼吸(后者能够在肺部沉淀)。粉尘的形状、大小和密度会影响呼吸系统的行为和渗透。可吸入部分由小于10微米的颗粒组成,即它们可以到达发生气体交换的区域;更大的,它们通常沉积在鼻和胸部区域。小于100纳米的二氧化硅纳米颗粒可以到达血液。吸入后,二氧化硅颗粒主要沉积在细支气管和肺泡中;如果纤毛黏液清除不充分,就会发生炎症(肺泡炎),从而导致纤维化和癌症。巨噬细胞激活产生自由基/活性氧,这些自由基/活性氧并不总是被抗氧化防御所削弱。持续接触会增加细胞因子的释放,进而激活更多的巨噬细胞、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞;胶原蛋白的增加将导致纤维化,降低肺的盈利能力和效率;即气体交换减少;因为它也可以到达胸膜。尽管越来越有效的健康和安全系统提供了进步,但在某些情况下矽肺仍然是一个问题,因此在这些团队中工作的专业人员有必要对可能发生矽肺的部门/任务、辅助诊断测试和其他监测参数、集体和个人保护措施以及可能对工作能力分类的影响有合理的了解。通过传播在这方面进行的调查,更好地了解国家情况是有意义的。关键词:二氧化硅、矽肺病、工作安全、职业卫生和职业医学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abordagem da Saúde Ocupacional perante surtos de Escabiose Lesão Cortoperfurante complicada numa Enfermeira dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários: um Relato de Caso Alérgenos e Asma Ocupacional na Panificação: uma Revisão da Literatura Acidentes de Trabalho em Hospital Central: uma visão holística Avaliação do Risco Cardiovascular (SCORE-2) dos Trabalhadores de um Centro Hospitalar entre 2011 e 2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1