Bupivacaine–lidocaine versus bupivacaine–lidocaine plus dexamethasone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block

A. Abdelrazik, A. Ali, I. Youssef, Sohair A. Megalla
{"title":"Bupivacaine–lidocaine versus bupivacaine–lidocaine plus dexamethasone in supraclavicular brachial plexus block","authors":"A. Abdelrazik, A. Ali, I. Youssef, Sohair A. Megalla","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_50_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background To evaluate whether dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine–lidocaine mixture in supraclavicular brachial plexus block can enhance the block, prolong the duration of action, and improve postoperative analgesia than a mixture of bupivacaine–lidocaine only. Patients and methods In all, 60 patients were posted for elective and emergent upper limb orthopedic surgery (below shoulder joint), under supraclavicular brachial plexus block guided by a nerve stimulator. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group C (the control group, n=30) received 40 ml solution containing local anesthetics only. Group D (the dexamethasone group, n=30) received a 40 ml solution containing local anesthetics plus 4 mg dexamethasone. Primary outcomes were onset time of sensory and motor block, and duration of sensory and motor block, which were assessed in minutes. Secondary outcomes were pain assessment using a scoring system based on the visual analog scale, time to first analgesic requirement, and total analgesic consumption. Results Duration of sensory and motor block in the dexamethasone group were significantly longer than the control group (753±68.04 vs. 565±30.85 min and 733.66±69.77 vs. 547.16±29.38 min, respectively). For visual analog scale, while comparing the two groups, the differences were significant at 9, 12, and 18 h after surgery in favor of the dexamethasone group. The time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the dexamethasone group in comparison to the control group. The total analgesic requirement was also significantly lower in the dexamethasone group in comparison to the control group. Conclusion The use of dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg as an adjuvant to local anesthetics provided effective prolongation in the duration of sensory and motor block, prolonged time to first analgesic request, and reduced the total analgesic consumption.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_50_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background To evaluate whether dexamethasone as an adjuvant to bupivacaine–lidocaine mixture in supraclavicular brachial plexus block can enhance the block, prolong the duration of action, and improve postoperative analgesia than a mixture of bupivacaine–lidocaine only. Patients and methods In all, 60 patients were posted for elective and emergent upper limb orthopedic surgery (below shoulder joint), under supraclavicular brachial plexus block guided by a nerve stimulator. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group C (the control group, n=30) received 40 ml solution containing local anesthetics only. Group D (the dexamethasone group, n=30) received a 40 ml solution containing local anesthetics plus 4 mg dexamethasone. Primary outcomes were onset time of sensory and motor block, and duration of sensory and motor block, which were assessed in minutes. Secondary outcomes were pain assessment using a scoring system based on the visual analog scale, time to first analgesic requirement, and total analgesic consumption. Results Duration of sensory and motor block in the dexamethasone group were significantly longer than the control group (753±68.04 vs. 565±30.85 min and 733.66±69.77 vs. 547.16±29.38 min, respectively). For visual analog scale, while comparing the two groups, the differences were significant at 9, 12, and 18 h after surgery in favor of the dexamethasone group. The time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the dexamethasone group in comparison to the control group. The total analgesic requirement was also significantly lower in the dexamethasone group in comparison to the control group. Conclusion The use of dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg as an adjuvant to local anesthetics provided effective prolongation in the duration of sensory and motor block, prolonged time to first analgesic request, and reduced the total analgesic consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布比卡因-利多卡因与布比卡因-利多卡因加地塞米松治疗锁骨上臂丛阻滞
背景:评价地塞米松辅助布比卡因-利多卡因混合治疗锁骨上臂丛阻滞是否比单独布比卡因-利多卡因混合治疗能增强阻滞,延长作用时间,改善术后镇痛。患者和方法60例患者在锁骨上臂丛阻滞下接受选择性和紧急上肢矫形手术(肩关节下),手术由神经刺激器引导。患者随机分为两组:C组(对照组,n=30)给予仅含局麻药的溶液40 ml。D组(地塞米松组,n=30)给予局麻药加地塞米松4mg溶液40 ml。主要结局是感觉和运动阻滞的发生时间,以及感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间,以分钟为单位进行评估。次要结果是使用基于视觉模拟量表的评分系统进行疼痛评估,到达首次镇痛要求的时间和总镇痛消耗。结果地塞米松组感觉阻滞时间明显长于对照组(753±68.04∶565±30.85∶733.66±69.77∶547.16±29.38);在视觉模拟量表上,两组在术后9、12、18 h比较,地塞米松组差异有统计学意义。与对照组相比,地塞米松组首次要求镇痛的时间明显更长。与对照组相比,地塞米松组的总镇痛需求也显著降低。结论4 mg地塞米松辅助局麻药可有效延长感觉和运动阻滞持续时间,延长首次镇痛请求时间,减少总镇痛消耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1