An Example of (Too Much) Hyper-Parameter Tuning In Suicide Ideation Detection

Annika Marie Schoene, John E. Ortega, Silvio Amir, Kenneth Ward Church
{"title":"An Example of (Too Much) Hyper-Parameter Tuning In Suicide Ideation Detection","authors":"Annika Marie Schoene, John E. Ortega, Silvio Amir, Kenneth Ward Church","doi":"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work starts with the TWISCO baseline, a benchmark of suicide-related content from Twitter. We find that hyper-parameter tuning can improve this baseline by 9%. We examined 576 combinations of hyper-parameters: learning rate, batch size, epochs and date range of training data. Reasonable settings of learning rate and batch size produce better results than poor settings. Date range is less conclusive. Balancing the date range of the training data to match the benchmark ought to improve performance, but the differences are relatively small. Optimal settings of learning rate and batch size are much better than poor settings, but optimal settings of date range are not that different from poor settings of date range. Finally, we end with concerns about reproducibility. Of the 576 experiments, 10% produced F1 performance above baseline. It is common practice in the literature to run many experiments and report the best, but doing so may be risky, especially given the sensitive nature of Suicide Ideation Detection.","PeriodicalId":175641,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work starts with the TWISCO baseline, a benchmark of suicide-related content from Twitter. We find that hyper-parameter tuning can improve this baseline by 9%. We examined 576 combinations of hyper-parameters: learning rate, batch size, epochs and date range of training data. Reasonable settings of learning rate and batch size produce better results than poor settings. Date range is less conclusive. Balancing the date range of the training data to match the benchmark ought to improve performance, but the differences are relatively small. Optimal settings of learning rate and batch size are much better than poor settings, but optimal settings of date range are not that different from poor settings of date range. Finally, we end with concerns about reproducibility. Of the 576 experiments, 10% produced F1 performance above baseline. It is common practice in the literature to run many experiments and report the best, but doing so may be risky, especially given the sensitive nature of Suicide Ideation Detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自杀意念检测中(过多)超参数调整的一个例子
这项工作从TWISCO基线开始,TWISCO基线是Twitter上与自杀相关内容的基准。我们发现超参数调优可以将这个基线提高9%。我们检查了576种超参数组合:学习率、批大小、epoch和训练数据的日期范围。合理的学习率和批量大小设置比不合理的设置效果更好。日期范围则不那么确定。平衡训练数据的日期范围以匹配基准应该会提高性能,但差异相对较小。学习率和批大小的最优设置要比差设置好得多,但数据范围的最优设置和差设置并没有太大的区别。最后,我们以对再现性的关注作为结束。在576个实验中,10%的F1性能高于基线。在文献中,进行许多实验并报告最佳结果是常见的做法,但这样做可能有风险,特别是考虑到自杀意念检测的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RTANet: Recommendation Target-Aware Network Embedding Who Is behind a Trend? Temporal Analysis of Interactions among Trend Participants on Twitter Host-Centric Social Connectedness of Migrants in Europe on Facebook Recipe Networks and the Principles of Healthy Food on the Web Social Influence-Maximizing Group Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1