Military trauma training performed in a civilian trauma center.

M. Schreiber, J. Holcomb, C. Conaway, Kyle D. Campbell, M. Wall, K. Mattox
{"title":"Military trauma training performed in a civilian trauma center.","authors":"M. Schreiber, J. Holcomb, C. Conaway, Kyle D. Campbell, M. Wall, K. Mattox","doi":"10.1006/JSRE.2002.6391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIn 1996, Congress passed legislation requiring the Department of Defense to conduct trauma training in civilian hospitals. In September of 1998 an Army team composed of surgeons, nurses, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), and operating room technicians (OR techs) trained in a civilian level 1 trauma center. This study analyzes the quality of the training.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe training period was 30 days. Before and after training all members completed a questionnaire of their individual and team ability to perform at their home station, at the civilian hospital, and in the combat setting. Surgeons maintained an operative log, which was compared with their prior year's experience. Primary trauma cases (PTCs) met Residency Review Committee criteria as defined category cases and were done acutely. Other personnel tracked the percentage of supporting soldier tasks (SSTs) they performed or were exposed to during the training period.\n\n\nRESULTS\nReview of the questionnaires revealed a significant increase in confidence levels in all areas tested (P < 0.005). The three general surgeons performed a total of 42 PTCs during the 28 call periods, or 1.5 PTCs per call period. During the prior year, the same three general surgeons performed 20 PTCs during 114 call periods for 0.175 cases per call period (P = 0.003). The maximum number of PTCs performed during one call period at the civilian center was 4, compared with 5 PTCs performed by one Army surgeon during the Somalia 1993 mass casualty event. Performance of or exposure to SSTs was 71% for the EMTs, 94% for the nurses, and 79% for the OR techs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nA 1-month training experience at a civilian trauma center provided military general surgeons with a greater trauma experience than they receive in 1 year at their home station. Other personnel on the team benefited by performing or being exposed to their SSTs. Further training of military teams in civilian trauma centers should be investigated.","PeriodicalId":191568,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of surgical research","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1006/JSRE.2002.6391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

BACKGROUND In 1996, Congress passed legislation requiring the Department of Defense to conduct trauma training in civilian hospitals. In September of 1998 an Army team composed of surgeons, nurses, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), and operating room technicians (OR techs) trained in a civilian level 1 trauma center. This study analyzes the quality of the training. METHODS The training period was 30 days. Before and after training all members completed a questionnaire of their individual and team ability to perform at their home station, at the civilian hospital, and in the combat setting. Surgeons maintained an operative log, which was compared with their prior year's experience. Primary trauma cases (PTCs) met Residency Review Committee criteria as defined category cases and were done acutely. Other personnel tracked the percentage of supporting soldier tasks (SSTs) they performed or were exposed to during the training period. RESULTS Review of the questionnaires revealed a significant increase in confidence levels in all areas tested (P < 0.005). The three general surgeons performed a total of 42 PTCs during the 28 call periods, or 1.5 PTCs per call period. During the prior year, the same three general surgeons performed 20 PTCs during 114 call periods for 0.175 cases per call period (P = 0.003). The maximum number of PTCs performed during one call period at the civilian center was 4, compared with 5 PTCs performed by one Army surgeon during the Somalia 1993 mass casualty event. Performance of or exposure to SSTs was 71% for the EMTs, 94% for the nurses, and 79% for the OR techs. CONCLUSIONS A 1-month training experience at a civilian trauma center provided military general surgeons with a greater trauma experience than they receive in 1 year at their home station. Other personnel on the team benefited by performing or being exposed to their SSTs. Further training of military teams in civilian trauma centers should be investigated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在平民创伤中心进行的军事创伤训练。
1996年,国会通过立法,要求国防部在民用医院开展创伤培训。1998年9月,一支由外科医生、护士、紧急医疗技术人员(emt)和手术室技术人员(OR techs)组成的陆军小组在一个民用一级创伤中心接受了培训。本研究分析了培训的质量。方法训练时间为30 d。在培训前后,所有成员都完成了一份问卷,调查他们个人和团队在其驻地、民用医院和战斗环境中的表现能力。外科医生保留手术记录,与他们前一年的经验进行比较。原发性创伤病例(ptc)符合住院医师审查委员会定义的类别病例标准,并且是急性的。其他人员跟踪他们在训练期间执行或接触到的支援士兵任务(SSTs)的百分比。结果问卷调查显示,在所有测试领域的置信水平显著提高(P < 0.005)。三名普通外科医生在28个就诊期间共进行了42次ptc,或每个就诊期间1.5次ptc。在前一年,同样的三名普通外科医生在114个就诊期间进行了20例ptc,每个就诊期间为0.175例(P = 0.003)。在平民中心一次就诊期间最多进行4次手术,而在1993年索马里大规模伤亡事件期间,一名陆军外科医生进行了5次手术。急救医生表现或接触SSTs的比例为71%,护士为94%,手术室技术员为79%。结论在民用创伤中心1个月的培训经验使军队普通外科医生获得的创伤经验多于在其家乡工作1年的创伤经验。团队中的其他人员通过执行或接触他们的SSTs而受益。应研究在平民创伤中心进一步培训军事小组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel Application of Hydrodissection in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gangrenous Gallbladders. A is for American. Asian. Ally. Applying Behavioral Nudges in a Dietary Comparator for Surgical Trials: Developing the MediDiet Preoperative Anemia is Associated With Postoperative Renal Failure After Elective Open Aortic Repair. A Virtual Tumor Board Platform: A Way to Enhance Decision-Making for Complex Malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1