{"title":"Optimization of Perforation Efficiency in the Delaware Basin Through XLE Perforating and Innovative Perforating Charge; A Case Study","authors":"Phil Churchwell, B. McQueen, Paul M. Weddle","doi":"10.2118/212345-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This case study looked to identify a perforation design and a perforation charge that measurably increases Perforation Efficiency (PE) and reduces PE variability from stage to stage. Achieving these goals allows for more economic fracture surface area generation as well as more informed decisions toward frac design and full field development.\n Primarily relying on industry-standard pre-fracture Step-Down Tests (SDT) to estimate number of perforation holes open, a variety of strategies and technologies were tested by altering perforation friction, orientation, entry hole diameter (EHD), perforations per cluster (PPC), and charge type. The trial was performed across multiple horizons in the Delaware Basin, consisting of over 4,500 stages from 193 wells across 13 horizons from the 1st Bone Spring Sand to the Wolfcamp C in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico.\n With the legacy perforation strategy and technology, the operator historically achieved a probability 50 (P50) using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of 47% of perforations open pre-fracture. Utilizing eXtreme Limited Entry (XLE), 0 degree-oriented perforating, larger EHD, single perforation clusters, and a shaped charge which increases the reservoir contact area, the operator was able to increase the CDF P50 to 93% of perforations open pre-fracture.\n This straightforward trial allowed the operator to meaningfully reduce the cost of operations while type curves were met or exceeded. Contributing to the success of this field trial was a clear and restricted design of the experiment in combination with a special shale-optimized perforating charge designed for greater near wellbore reservoir contact area.","PeriodicalId":402242,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212345-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This case study looked to identify a perforation design and a perforation charge that measurably increases Perforation Efficiency (PE) and reduces PE variability from stage to stage. Achieving these goals allows for more economic fracture surface area generation as well as more informed decisions toward frac design and full field development.
Primarily relying on industry-standard pre-fracture Step-Down Tests (SDT) to estimate number of perforation holes open, a variety of strategies and technologies were tested by altering perforation friction, orientation, entry hole diameter (EHD), perforations per cluster (PPC), and charge type. The trial was performed across multiple horizons in the Delaware Basin, consisting of over 4,500 stages from 193 wells across 13 horizons from the 1st Bone Spring Sand to the Wolfcamp C in Lea and Eddy Counties, New Mexico.
With the legacy perforation strategy and technology, the operator historically achieved a probability 50 (P50) using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of 47% of perforations open pre-fracture. Utilizing eXtreme Limited Entry (XLE), 0 degree-oriented perforating, larger EHD, single perforation clusters, and a shaped charge which increases the reservoir contact area, the operator was able to increase the CDF P50 to 93% of perforations open pre-fracture.
This straightforward trial allowed the operator to meaningfully reduce the cost of operations while type curves were met or exceeded. Contributing to the success of this field trial was a clear and restricted design of the experiment in combination with a special shale-optimized perforating charge designed for greater near wellbore reservoir contact area.
本案例研究旨在确定能够显著提高射孔效率(PE)并减少不同压裂段PE变化的射孔设计和射孔装药。实现这些目标可以更经济地产生裂缝表面积,并在压裂设计和全油田开发方面做出更明智的决策。主要依靠行业标准的压裂前降压测试(SDT)来估计已打开的射孔孔数,通过改变射孔摩擦、射孔方位、入孔直径(EHD)、每簇射孔数(PPC)和装药类型,测试了各种策略和技术。该试验在Delaware盆地的多个层位进行,包括从第1 Bone Spring Sand到新墨西哥州Lea和Eddy县的Wolfcamp C的13个层位的193口井的4500多个阶段。利用传统的射孔策略和技术,作业者利用累积分布函数(CDF)实现了50%的概率(P50),即47%的射孔在压裂前打开。利用极限有限射孔(XLE)、0度定向射孔、更大的EHD、单个射孔簇以及增加储层接触面积的聚能装药,作业者能够将CDF P50提高到93%的压裂前射孔。这项简单的试验使作业者在满足或超过类型曲线的情况下显著降低了作业成本。现场试验的成功得益于实验设计的清晰和限制,以及一种特殊的页岩优化射孔药,该射孔药设计用于更大的近井油藏接触面积。