{"title":"The Theatre of Genet: A Sociological Study","authors":"L. Goldmann","doi":"10.1017/s0273435400590336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Until a few years ago, aestheticians, critics, and literary historians\n accorded sociology only marginal status. However, the availability of Georg\n Lukacs’ early work, the psychological and epistemological researches of Jean\n Piaget, and the acceptance of the dialectic as genetic structuralism has\n changed all that.\n Traditional sociology —which still dominates university teaching — tried\n to relate the content of a literary work to the\n content of the collective unconscious: how\n men think and act in daily life. Such criticism becomes more effective the\n more mundane is the writer being studied, content merely to relate his\n experiences without imaginatively transposing them. Structural sociology\n begins from premises that exclude those of traditional sociology.","PeriodicalId":429245,"journal":{"name":"TDR (1967)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TDR (1967)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0273435400590336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Until a few years ago, aestheticians, critics, and literary historians
accorded sociology only marginal status. However, the availability of Georg
Lukacs’ early work, the psychological and epistemological researches of Jean
Piaget, and the acceptance of the dialectic as genetic structuralism has
changed all that.
Traditional sociology —which still dominates university teaching — tried
to relate the content of a literary work to the
content of the collective unconscious: how
men think and act in daily life. Such criticism becomes more effective the
more mundane is the writer being studied, content merely to relate his
experiences without imaginatively transposing them. Structural sociology
begins from premises that exclude those of traditional sociology.