Incorporación de la técnica ecoguiada en la inserción periférica de vías centrales: un nuevo reto para enfermería en cuidados intensivos

Mercedes Marraco-Boncompte, Blanca Isabel Lorente-Roda, María Echamendi-Hernández, Alicia Yagüe-Gastón, Itziar Martínez-Arangoa, Marta Lerín-Lebrero
{"title":"Incorporación de la técnica ecoguiada en la inserción periférica de vías centrales: un nuevo reto para enfermería en cuidados intensivos","authors":"Mercedes Marraco-Boncompte,&nbsp;Blanca Isabel Lorente-Roda,&nbsp;María Echamendi-Hernández,&nbsp;Alicia Yagüe-Gastón,&nbsp;Itziar Martínez-Arangoa,&nbsp;Marta Lerín-Lebrero","doi":"10.1016/j.nursi.2019.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To describe the results of the incorporation of ultrasound guided technique for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in a polivalent intensive care unit.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Descriptive and comparative observational study. 140 cases were included. Demographic data, type of catheter, use of ultrasound or not, description of the procedure and main complications were collected.</p><p>In the descriptive statistics, frequency distributions were performed for qualitative data, and mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>72.9% male and 27.1% female patients. Average age: 63.43 years. 94.5% successful peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC's) insertion. Ultrasound guided technique was used in 48%. The main reason for its use was a difficult venous access or visualization (39%). There were no significant differences between ultrasound guided puncture and blind punture regarding the complications: phlebitis (1.4% vs 2.8%), infections (0.7% vs 0%) and bacteremia (0% vs 0.7%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results obtained show that PICC's placement in our intensive care unit is a procedure with high percentage of success and very low incidence of infections, and with positive results after the incorporation of the ultrasound for difficult venous access.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100975,"journal":{"name":"Nursing (Ed. espa?ola)","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 53-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing (Ed. espa?ola)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212538219300470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To describe the results of the incorporation of ultrasound guided technique for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in a polivalent intensive care unit.

Methods

Descriptive and comparative observational study. 140 cases were included. Demographic data, type of catheter, use of ultrasound or not, description of the procedure and main complications were collected.

In the descriptive statistics, frequency distributions were performed for qualitative data, and mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variables.

Results

72.9% male and 27.1% female patients. Average age: 63.43 years. 94.5% successful peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC's) insertion. Ultrasound guided technique was used in 48%. The main reason for its use was a difficult venous access or visualization (39%). There were no significant differences between ultrasound guided puncture and blind punture regarding the complications: phlebitis (1.4% vs 2.8%), infections (0.7% vs 0%) and bacteremia (0% vs 0.7%).

Conclusions

The results obtained show that PICC's placement in our intensive care unit is a procedure with high percentage of success and very low incidence of infections, and with positive results after the incorporation of the ultrasound for difficult venous access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态引导技术在中央通路外周插入中的应用:重症监护护理的新挑战
目的探讨超声引导下外周中心置管(PICC)在重症监护病房的应用效果。方法采用描述性和比较性观察研究。纳入140例病例。收集患者的人口学资料、导管类型、是否使用超声、手术过程描述及主要并发症。描述性统计对定性资料进行频率分布,对定量变量进行均值和标准差分布。结果男性占72.9%,女性占27.1%。平均年龄:63.43岁。94.5%成功置入外周中心导管(PICC)。超声引导技术占48%。使用它的主要原因是静脉通路或可视化困难(39%)。超声引导穿刺与盲穿刺的并发症:静脉炎(1.4% vs 2.8%)、感染(0.7% vs 0%)、菌血症(0% vs 0.7%)差异无统计学意义。结论PICC在重症监护室的安置是一种成功率高、感染发生率极低的手术,在静脉通道困难的情况下,超声介入后效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prioridades en materia de seguridad en la UCPA Higiene del sueño en pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica Prevención de la aspiración: Una cuestión de vida y respiración Enfermería de telesalud: algo más que una simple llamada telefónica Cómo reconocer la sobredosis de cafeína
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1