¿Difiere la rentabilidad y el riesgo en los fondos de inversión no convencionales?

Marcos González Fernández, Carmen González Velasco
{"title":"¿Difiere la rentabilidad y el riesgo en los fondos de inversión no convencionales?","authors":"Marcos González Fernández,&nbsp;Carmen González Velasco","doi":"10.1016/j.cede.2012.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this paper is to analyze the return and risk of different categories of funds managed using non-conventional management criteria, in order to test which achieve a better performance. Three periods, two bullish phases and one bearish phase, were analyzed. Three categories of non-conventional investment funds were examined: socially responsible investment funds, funds based on the principles of Behavioral Finance, and finally the Vice Fund, applying a medium-difference analysis and a multivariate analysis along with the Sharpe ratio and information ratio. No significant differences were found between the returns of the three categories, except as regards their volatility. Using the estimated multivariate model it was not possible to get significant differences between the three categories of funds or the market index in most cases. Ratio analysis enabled us to establish a fund ranking, but was unable to show which management was the most appropriate throughout the different periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100345,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 194-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cede.2012.11.003","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138575812000850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the return and risk of different categories of funds managed using non-conventional management criteria, in order to test which achieve a better performance. Three periods, two bullish phases and one bearish phase, were analyzed. Three categories of non-conventional investment funds were examined: socially responsible investment funds, funds based on the principles of Behavioral Finance, and finally the Vice Fund, applying a medium-difference analysis and a multivariate analysis along with the Sharpe ratio and information ratio. No significant differences were found between the returns of the three categories, except as regards their volatility. Using the estimated multivariate model it was not possible to get significant differences between the three categories of funds or the market index in most cases. Ratio analysis enabled us to establish a fund ranking, but was unable to show which management was the most appropriate throughout the different periods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非常规投资基金的回报和风险是否不同?
本文的目的是分析使用非常规管理准则管理的不同类别基金的收益和风险,以检验哪种基金的业绩更好。分析了三个时期,两个看涨阶段和一个看跌阶段。本文研究了三种非传统投资基金:社会责任投资基金,基于行为金融学原理的基金,最后是副基金,运用了中等差异分析和多元分析以及夏普比率和信息比率。除了波动性外,这三类的回报率之间没有显著差异。使用估计的多变量模型,在大多数情况下不可能得到三类基金或市场指数之间的显著差异。比率分析使我们能够建立基金排名,但无法显示在不同时期哪种管理是最合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capacidades de investigación y directivas: señales informativas en la salida a bolsa de las empresas de base tecnológica Relación entre las prácticas de recursos humanos, la innovación y el rendimiento en clústeres geográficos Influencia de las prácticas de recursos humanos en la flexibilidad de los empleados La internacionalización como variable moderadora en las estrategias fabricante-distribuidor Las cajas de ahorros españolas: ¿una pretendida reordenación bajo criterios de racionalidad económica y social?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1