An empirical evaluation of two memory-efficient directory methods

Brian W. O'Krafka, A. Richard Newton
{"title":"An empirical evaluation of two memory-efficient directory methods","authors":"Brian W. O'Krafka, A. Richard Newton","doi":"10.1145/325164.325130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors present an empirical evaluation of two memory-efficient directory methods for maintaining coherent caches in large shared-memory multiprocessors. Both directory methods are modifications of a scheme proposed by L.M. Censier and P. Feautrier (1978) that does not rely on a specific interconnection network and can be readily distributed across interleaved main memory. The schemes considered here overcome the large amount of memory required for tags in the original scheme in two different ways. In the first scheme each main memory block is sectored into sub-blocks for which the large tag overhead is shared. In the second scheme a limited number of large tags are stored in an associative cache and shared among a much larger number of main memory blocks. Simulations show that in terms of access time and network traffic both directory methods provide significant performance improvements over a memory system in which shared-writable data are not cached. The large block sizes required for the sectored scheme, however, promote sufficient false sharing for its performance to be markedly worse than when a tag cache is used.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":297046,"journal":{"name":"[1990] Proceedings. The 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"135","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1990] Proceedings. The 17th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/325164.325130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 135

Abstract

The authors present an empirical evaluation of two memory-efficient directory methods for maintaining coherent caches in large shared-memory multiprocessors. Both directory methods are modifications of a scheme proposed by L.M. Censier and P. Feautrier (1978) that does not rely on a specific interconnection network and can be readily distributed across interleaved main memory. The schemes considered here overcome the large amount of memory required for tags in the original scheme in two different ways. In the first scheme each main memory block is sectored into sub-blocks for which the large tag overhead is shared. In the second scheme a limited number of large tags are stored in an associative cache and shared among a much larger number of main memory blocks. Simulations show that in terms of access time and network traffic both directory methods provide significant performance improvements over a memory system in which shared-writable data are not cached. The large block sizes required for the sectored scheme, however, promote sufficient false sharing for its performance to be markedly worse than when a tag cache is used.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种内存效率目录方法的经验评价
作者提出了在大型共享内存多处理器中维护一致缓存的两种内存效率目录方法的经验评估。这两种目录方法都是对L.M. Censier和P. Feautrier(1978)提出的方案的修改,该方案不依赖于特定的互连网络,可以很容易地分布在交错主存储器上。这里考虑的方案以两种不同的方式克服了原始方案中标签所需的大量内存。在第一种方案中,每个主内存块被分割成子块,这些子块共享大的标记开销。在第二种方案中,将有限数量的大标记存储在关联缓存中,并在数量大得多的主存储器块之间共享。模拟表明,在访问时间和网络流量方面,两种目录方法都比不缓存共享可写数据的内存系统提供了显著的性能改进。然而,扇区方案所需的大块大小会促进足够的错误共享,从而使其性能明显低于使用标签缓存时的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Architectural support for the management of tightly-coupled fine-grain goals in Flat Concurrent Prolog VAX vector architecture Weak ordering-a new definition The directory-based cache coherence protocol for the DASH multiprocessor Dynamic processor allocation in hypercube computers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1