Off the Grid: Zora Neale Hurston’s Racial Geography in Their Eyes Were Watching God

Alexander Ashland
{"title":"Off the Grid: Zora Neale Hurston’s Racial Geography in Their Eyes Were Watching God","authors":"Alexander Ashland","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On either hand, far down below, rolled the deep foamy water of the Potomac, and before and behind the rapidly approaching step and noisy voices of pursuers, showing how vain would be any further effort for freedom. Her resolution was taken. She clasped her hands convulsively, and raised them, as she at the same time raised her eyes towards heaven, and begged for that mercy and compassion there, which had been denied her on earth; and then, with a single bound, she vaulted over the railings of the bridge, and sunk for ever beneath the waves of the river! (Hurston 207)The following passage, taken from William Wells Brown's Clotel, famously depicts the death of Thomas Jefferson's fictional mixed-race daughter. It also helps establish a literary tradition in which bridges fail, at least for some.1 Part of what makes Brown's hybrid text so remarkable, though, is its ability to imagine the unexpected linkages that begin to emerge in response to society's own infrastructural defects. Particularly in this scene, Clotel's raised hands and upward gaze transfigure the body itself into a kind of bridge, one whose vertical alignments call attention to the actual horizontal support systems that reduced the body to a mere property transaction. Clotel's suicide demonstrates what the de-propertying of American slaves looks like given a system that positions \"freedom\" in terms of territorial expansion, ownership, and regulation. Rather than return to the land of her captors, she \"vault[s] over\" into water, and this act of self-(un)making is motivated by and dependent on a sequence of surficial arrangements that are themselves inseparable from the personal and political landscapes to which they are a part. For Brown, such freedoms are always performed within a spatial arena that is at once physical and political, topographical and social, concrete and discursive. He sensed the ways in which human and geographic \"bodies\" were managed according to similar logics of territorial importance. Clotel, for example, had intended the \"Long Bridge\" to communicate her to safety, yet the romantic ideal she crafts of being able to \"bury herself in a vast forest\" (205) ultimately reveals itself as little more than an ironic foreshadowing of her being routinely \"deposited\" in a \"hole dug in the sand\" (207). Situating Clotel's nameless, abandoned corpse in relation to other well-known \"bodies\" like the Potomac River enables Brown to plot those sites of resistance normally muted by the neutralizing gestures of commercial maps.To deny that these geographic spaces code subjectivity the same way as Clotel's living (and dying) presence ignores the geopolitical significance of water as a body, as a measureable thing whose meaning is generated by a combination of material and immaterial investments. For the slave owner, the river signifies a capitalist futurity which cannot be detached from the physical property it transports. For Clotel, it serves as a destructive force capable of stalling the violent economizing of human \"goods,\" while at the same time serving as a potential site of spiritual deliverance. Each case reveals agency as being intimately attached to the physical spaces in which it is activated. At stake too are the biogeographic equivalencies that organize separable \"bodies\" under a set of shared commercial rubrics. As Donald Sweig points out, the Potomac River was a \"major commercial artery\" (507) for the trafficking of slaves, and the catastrophe with which Brown ends his novel dramatizes the exact limit at which such capital/corporal investments are capable of being sustained. Clotel's suicide joins two distinct yet related bodies, the radical conflation of which-corpse is place, place corpse-threatens to remap dominant commercial and ideological terrains according to the associations of the sold rather than the seller. Clotel's \"vertical\" notion of freedom proves incompatible with those strong horizontal networks of corporal regulation, control, and distribution. …","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On either hand, far down below, rolled the deep foamy water of the Potomac, and before and behind the rapidly approaching step and noisy voices of pursuers, showing how vain would be any further effort for freedom. Her resolution was taken. She clasped her hands convulsively, and raised them, as she at the same time raised her eyes towards heaven, and begged for that mercy and compassion there, which had been denied her on earth; and then, with a single bound, she vaulted over the railings of the bridge, and sunk for ever beneath the waves of the river! (Hurston 207)The following passage, taken from William Wells Brown's Clotel, famously depicts the death of Thomas Jefferson's fictional mixed-race daughter. It also helps establish a literary tradition in which bridges fail, at least for some.1 Part of what makes Brown's hybrid text so remarkable, though, is its ability to imagine the unexpected linkages that begin to emerge in response to society's own infrastructural defects. Particularly in this scene, Clotel's raised hands and upward gaze transfigure the body itself into a kind of bridge, one whose vertical alignments call attention to the actual horizontal support systems that reduced the body to a mere property transaction. Clotel's suicide demonstrates what the de-propertying of American slaves looks like given a system that positions "freedom" in terms of territorial expansion, ownership, and regulation. Rather than return to the land of her captors, she "vault[s] over" into water, and this act of self-(un)making is motivated by and dependent on a sequence of surficial arrangements that are themselves inseparable from the personal and political landscapes to which they are a part. For Brown, such freedoms are always performed within a spatial arena that is at once physical and political, topographical and social, concrete and discursive. He sensed the ways in which human and geographic "bodies" were managed according to similar logics of territorial importance. Clotel, for example, had intended the "Long Bridge" to communicate her to safety, yet the romantic ideal she crafts of being able to "bury herself in a vast forest" (205) ultimately reveals itself as little more than an ironic foreshadowing of her being routinely "deposited" in a "hole dug in the sand" (207). Situating Clotel's nameless, abandoned corpse in relation to other well-known "bodies" like the Potomac River enables Brown to plot those sites of resistance normally muted by the neutralizing gestures of commercial maps.To deny that these geographic spaces code subjectivity the same way as Clotel's living (and dying) presence ignores the geopolitical significance of water as a body, as a measureable thing whose meaning is generated by a combination of material and immaterial investments. For the slave owner, the river signifies a capitalist futurity which cannot be detached from the physical property it transports. For Clotel, it serves as a destructive force capable of stalling the violent economizing of human "goods," while at the same time serving as a potential site of spiritual deliverance. Each case reveals agency as being intimately attached to the physical spaces in which it is activated. At stake too are the biogeographic equivalencies that organize separable "bodies" under a set of shared commercial rubrics. As Donald Sweig points out, the Potomac River was a "major commercial artery" (507) for the trafficking of slaves, and the catastrophe with which Brown ends his novel dramatizes the exact limit at which such capital/corporal investments are capable of being sustained. Clotel's suicide joins two distinct yet related bodies, the radical conflation of which-corpse is place, place corpse-threatens to remap dominant commercial and ideological terrains according to the associations of the sold rather than the seller. Clotel's "vertical" notion of freedom proves incompatible with those strong horizontal networks of corporal regulation, control, and distribution. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱离网络:佐拉·尼尔·赫斯顿的《他们眼中的种族地理》
在河的两边,下面是波托马克河的波涛汹涌,前面和后面都是追赶者迅速逼近的脚步声和嘈杂的声音,这表明任何进一步的自由努力都是徒劳的。她下定了决心。她痉挛地握紧双手,抬起双手,同时抬起眼睛望着天上,祈求天上的怜悯和怜悯,这是她在地上得不到的。然后,她纵身一跃,跳过了桥的栏杆,永远沉入了河波之中!下面这段话摘自威廉·威尔斯·布朗的《Clotel》,著名地描述了托马斯·杰斐逊虚构的混血女儿之死。它还帮助建立了一种文学传统,在这种传统中,桥梁坍塌了,至少对一些人来说是这样然而,布朗的混合文本之所以如此引人注目,部分原因在于它能够想象出在回应社会自身基础设施缺陷时开始出现的意想不到的联系。特别是在这个场景中,Clotel举起的双手和向上的目光使身体本身变成了一种桥梁,它的垂直排列使人们注意到实际的水平支撑系统,使身体变成了一种纯粹的财产交易。Clotel的自杀表明,在一个将“自由”定位于领土扩张、所有权和监管的制度下,美国奴隶的去财产化是什么样子的。她没有回到俘获她的人的土地上,而是“跳入”水中,这种自我创造的行为是由一系列表面的安排所激发和依赖的,这些安排本身与他们所处的个人和政治景观是分不开的。对布朗来说,这样的自由总是在一个空间舞台上进行的,这个空间舞台同时是物理的和政治的,地形的和社会的,具体的和话语的。他感觉到人类和地理“身体”是按照类似的领土重要性逻辑来管理的。例如,克洛特尔本想用“长桥”把她送到安全的地方,然而她所创造的能够“把自己埋在一片广阔的森林里”的浪漫理想(205)最终揭示出,这只不过是一个讽刺的伏笔,预示着她会习惯性地“被埋在”一个“在沙子里挖的洞里”(207)。将Clotel无名的、被遗弃的尸体与其他著名的“尸体”(如波托马克河)联系起来,使Brown能够绘制出那些通常被商业地图的中立姿态所掩盖的抵抗地点。否认这些地理空间对主体性的编码,就像否认克洛特尔活着(和死去)的存在一样,忽视了水作为一个身体的地缘政治意义,作为一种可测量的东西,其意义是由物质和非物质投资的组合产生的。对于奴隶主来说,这条河象征着资本主义的未来,它不能脱离它所运输的物质财产。对于Clotel来说,它是一种破坏性的力量,能够阻止人类“商品”的暴力经济,同时也可以作为精神解脱的潜在场所。每一个案例都揭示了代理与它被激活的物理空间紧密相连。在一套共享的商业准则下组织可分离的“身体”的生物地理等价物也岌岌可危。正如唐纳德·斯威格所指出的那样,波托马克河是贩卖奴隶的“主要商业动脉”(507),布朗小说结尾的灾难戏剧性地说明了这种资本/肉体投资能够持续的确切限制。Clotel的自杀将两种截然不同但又相关的身体联系在了一起,尸体就是地点,地点就是尸体,这两种极端的融合,可能会根据被卖者而不是卖者的联系,重新绘制占主导地位的商业和意识形态领域。Clotel的“垂直”自由概念被证明与那些强大的身体监管、控制和分销的水平网络不相容。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter, Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, Issue 20, Spring 2020 Biopolitical Bollywood: Sexual Violence as Cathartic Spectacle in ​Section 375 and ​Article 15 Turning Inward: Using Insight as a Catalyst for Change in "The Corrections" Thematic Fields, Transgressive Religion Revisionist Spectacle? Theatrical Remediation in Alejandro G. Iñárritu's Birdman and Quentin Tarantino's The Hateful Eight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1