Colonial internationalism and the governmentality of empire, 1893–1982

Margot Tudor
{"title":"Colonial internationalism and the governmentality of empire, 1893–1982","authors":"Margot Tudor","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2023.2173372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"politicians co-operated in new projects such as the first national parks and the 1922 law for the protection of natural beauties and historical buildings. His overall assessment, however, is a negative one: state involvement coincided with the slow decline of the movement and resulted in its eventual dismantling under the fascist regime. With a view to the literature about other countries, this seems surprising. In the United Kingdom, for example, noninvolvement of the state was a factor in the emergence of a vibrant network of private conservationist organisations, many of which tried to solicit active state support and legislation in the first half of the twentieth century. In the book’s last sections, Piccioni laments that traditions of nature conservation were not passed on to future generations in the ‘years of darkness’ (p. 283). He suggests that this may explain the late emergence of Italian environmentalism in the second half of the twentieth century (pp. 289–297). For all its justifiable focus on civil society actors in the field of nature conservation, this view seems needlessly negative about any involvement or support by the state in conservationist affairs. Moreover, the narrative does not fit in with more recent works about nature conservation and the environmental history of Italy under the fascist regime, which look beyond the demise of the conservationist movement. Even though the fascist regime’s actions were not usually a success story or even a disaster on the ground, it is valuable to look into what happened and how scientific ideas of nature conservation, local and national traditions, personal continuities, and fascism’s political ideology resulted in these actions. Piccioni did not amend his central state-critical narrative in this updated edition despite the alternative approaches offered by recent works, although these are duly referred to in the footnotes and bibliography. In a similar way, the book does not fully acknowledge recent research on nature conservation under various political regimes elsewhere in Europe in the inter-war period, or on the efforts of international conservationist networks to gain a platform in the League of Nations. Instead, it repeats the assumption that the international movement dwindled with the death of its first founders and the ‘end of cosmopolitanism’ in the 1920s (pp. 220–222). The book is and remains an excellent overview of the history of the first movement for nature protection in Italy. It is great that it can now reach the international audience it certainly deserves. Only for the political aspects after 1919, the audience should note that historiography has taken new directions since the book’s original publication.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2023.2173372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

politicians co-operated in new projects such as the first national parks and the 1922 law for the protection of natural beauties and historical buildings. His overall assessment, however, is a negative one: state involvement coincided with the slow decline of the movement and resulted in its eventual dismantling under the fascist regime. With a view to the literature about other countries, this seems surprising. In the United Kingdom, for example, noninvolvement of the state was a factor in the emergence of a vibrant network of private conservationist organisations, many of which tried to solicit active state support and legislation in the first half of the twentieth century. In the book’s last sections, Piccioni laments that traditions of nature conservation were not passed on to future generations in the ‘years of darkness’ (p. 283). He suggests that this may explain the late emergence of Italian environmentalism in the second half of the twentieth century (pp. 289–297). For all its justifiable focus on civil society actors in the field of nature conservation, this view seems needlessly negative about any involvement or support by the state in conservationist affairs. Moreover, the narrative does not fit in with more recent works about nature conservation and the environmental history of Italy under the fascist regime, which look beyond the demise of the conservationist movement. Even though the fascist regime’s actions were not usually a success story or even a disaster on the ground, it is valuable to look into what happened and how scientific ideas of nature conservation, local and national traditions, personal continuities, and fascism’s political ideology resulted in these actions. Piccioni did not amend his central state-critical narrative in this updated edition despite the alternative approaches offered by recent works, although these are duly referred to in the footnotes and bibliography. In a similar way, the book does not fully acknowledge recent research on nature conservation under various political regimes elsewhere in Europe in the inter-war period, or on the efforts of international conservationist networks to gain a platform in the League of Nations. Instead, it repeats the assumption that the international movement dwindled with the death of its first founders and the ‘end of cosmopolitanism’ in the 1920s (pp. 220–222). The book is and remains an excellent overview of the history of the first movement for nature protection in Italy. It is great that it can now reach the international audience it certainly deserves. Only for the political aspects after 1919, the audience should note that historiography has taken new directions since the book’s original publication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
殖民国际主义与帝国治理,1893-1982
政治家们在新项目上进行合作,比如第一批国家公园和1922年保护自然美景和历史建筑的法律。然而,他的总体评价是负面的:国家介入与运动的缓慢衰落同时发生,并导致其最终在法西斯政权下解体。从其他国家的文献来看,这似乎令人惊讶。例如,在英国,政府的不参与是私人环保组织活跃网络出现的一个因素,其中许多组织在20世纪上半叶试图寻求政府的积极支持和立法。在书的最后部分,Piccioni哀叹自然保护的传统没有在“黑暗的岁月”中传递给后代(第283页)。他认为这也许可以解释意大利环境保护主义在二十世纪下半叶的出现(第289-297页)。尽管这种观点对自然保护领域的民间社会行动者的关注是合理的,但它似乎对国家参与或支持自然保护事务持不必要的消极态度。此外,这种叙述与最近关于自然保护和法西斯政权下意大利环境史的作品不相符,这些作品超越了自然保护运动的消亡。尽管法西斯政权的行动通常不是一个成功的故事,甚至在地面上也不是一场灾难,但研究发生了什么,以及自然保护的科学思想、地方和国家传统、个人连续性和法西斯主义的政治意识形态是如何导致这些行动的,是有价值的。尽管最近的作品提供了替代方法,但皮乔尼在这个更新版本中没有修改他的中央国家批判叙事,尽管这些方法在脚注和参考书目中得到了适当的引用。同样,这本书也没有充分承认最近关于两次世界大战期间欧洲其他地区不同政治体制下的自然保护的研究,也没有充分承认国际自然保护主义者网络为在国际联盟中获得一个平台所做的努力。相反,它重复了这样的假设,即国际运动随着其第一批创始人的去世和20世纪20年代“世界主义的终结”而萎缩(第220-222页)。这本书是并且仍然是意大利第一次自然保护运动历史的优秀概述。它现在能够接触到它理应得到的国际观众,这真是太好了。仅就1919年之后的政治方面而言,读者应该注意到,自该书最初出版以来,史学已经采取了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traces of youth: reconstructing Hungarian women’s lives during the Holocaust Health, home and hearth: how war nurses negotiated their place at the table during the dawn of Francoist Spain Una Coscienza Coloniale : forging imperial women in the Fascist Colonial Institute of Bologna Land, indigeneity and archaeological ruins in Ottoman Palestine: the people of Beit Jibrin and the Palestine Exploration Fund ‘Fragt denn da ein junger Mensch nach?’: Would a young person ask that? Growing up in the Reichsarbeitsdienst in 1942
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1