Efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine in patients with essential hypertension. Danish Cooperative Study Group.

H A Jensen
{"title":"Efficacy and tolerability of lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine in patients with essential hypertension. Danish Cooperative Study Group.","authors":"H A Jensen","doi":"10.3109/10641969209038195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The antihypertensive effects of lisinopril 10-20 mg once daily and felodipine (extended release formulation) 5-10 mg once daily were compared in a double-blind, parallel group study of eight weeks duration involving 219 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. On lisinopril treatment sitting blood pressure fell from 166.3/102.9 +/- 17.5/5.8 mmHg to 146.7/89.7 +/- 19.5/8.7 mmHg and on felodipine blood pressure fell from 166.7/103.3 +/- 18.3/5.4 mmHg to 153.6/92.3 +/- 15.9/7.9 mmHg. The decreases in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly greater on lisinopril than on felodipine treatment (p = 0.019 and p = 0.033). A subgroup analysis in elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) showed that lisinopril and felodipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. In young subjects (age < 65 years) felodipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure less than did lisinopril treatment (p = 0.001). Lisinopril was better tolerated than felodipine. On lisinopril treatment, reports of headache and dizziness were reduced while that of cough increased. On felodipine treatment, dizziness was reduced but reports of flushing and oedema were increased. The results show a better antihypertensive effect and better tolerability for lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","volume":"14 6","pages":"1095-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10641969209038195","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental hypertension. Part A, Theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10641969209038195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The antihypertensive effects of lisinopril 10-20 mg once daily and felodipine (extended release formulation) 5-10 mg once daily were compared in a double-blind, parallel group study of eight weeks duration involving 219 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. On lisinopril treatment sitting blood pressure fell from 166.3/102.9 +/- 17.5/5.8 mmHg to 146.7/89.7 +/- 19.5/8.7 mmHg and on felodipine blood pressure fell from 166.7/103.3 +/- 18.3/5.4 mmHg to 153.6/92.3 +/- 15.9/7.9 mmHg. The decreases in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly greater on lisinopril than on felodipine treatment (p = 0.019 and p = 0.033). A subgroup analysis in elderly patients (age > or = 65 years) showed that lisinopril and felodipine were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. In young subjects (age < 65 years) felodipine treatment lowered systolic blood pressure less than did lisinopril treatment (p = 0.001). Lisinopril was better tolerated than felodipine. On lisinopril treatment, reports of headache and dizziness were reduced while that of cough increased. On felodipine treatment, dizziness was reduced but reports of flushing and oedema were increased. The results show a better antihypertensive effect and better tolerability for lisinopril compared with extended release felodipine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赖诺普利与缓释非洛地平在原发性高血压患者中的疗效和耐受性比较。丹麦合作研究小组。
在一项为期8周的双盲平行组研究中,219例轻中度高血压患者比较了赖诺普利10- 20mg每日1次和非洛地平(缓释制剂)5- 10mg每日1次的降压效果。赖诺普利组血压从166.3/102.9 +/- 17.5/5.8 mmHg降至146.7/89.7 +/- 19.5/8.7 mmHg,非洛地平组血压从166.7/103.3 +/- 18.3/5.4 mmHg降至153.6/92.3 +/- 15.9/7.9 mmHg。赖诺普利组坐位收缩压和舒张压的降低明显大于非洛地平组(p = 0.019和p = 0.033)。老年患者(年龄>或= 65岁)的亚组分析显示,赖诺普利和非洛地平在降低血压方面同样有效。在年轻受试者(年龄< 65岁)中,非洛地平治疗降低收缩压的效果小于赖诺普利治疗(p = 0.001)。赖诺普利的耐受性优于非洛地平。赖诺普利治疗后,头痛和头晕的报告减少,而咳嗽的报告增加。在非洛地平治疗中,头晕减少,但潮红和水肿的报告增加。结果表明,赖诺普利与缓释非洛地平相比具有更好的降压效果和耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies and difficulties in dietary intervention in myocardial infarction patients. Erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport in Chinese: its relationship to family history of hypertension. The ouabain-dependent Na(+)-K+ pump and the brain renin-angiotensin system. Effects of immobilization stress on renal sympathetic neurotransmission. ACTH hypertension in the rat: role of sodium chloride.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1