Ned Bakelman, John V. Monaco, Sung-Hyuk Cha, C. Tappert
{"title":"Keystroke Biometric Studies on Password and Numeric Keypad Input","authors":"Ned Bakelman, John V. Monaco, Sung-Hyuk Cha, C. Tappert","doi":"10.1109/EISIC.2013.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The keystroke biometric classification system described in this study was evaluated on two types of short input - passwords and numeric keypad input. On the password input, the system outperforms 14 other systems evaluated in a previous study using the same raw input data. The three top performing systems in that study had equal error rates between 9.6% and 10.2%. With the classification system developed in this study, equal error rates of 8.7% were achieved on both the features from the previous study and on a new set of features. On the numeric keypad input, the system achieved an equal error rate of 10.5% on the features from the previous study and 6.1% on a new set of features.","PeriodicalId":229195,"journal":{"name":"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2013.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26
Abstract
The keystroke biometric classification system described in this study was evaluated on two types of short input - passwords and numeric keypad input. On the password input, the system outperforms 14 other systems evaluated in a previous study using the same raw input data. The three top performing systems in that study had equal error rates between 9.6% and 10.2%. With the classification system developed in this study, equal error rates of 8.7% were achieved on both the features from the previous study and on a new set of features. On the numeric keypad input, the system achieved an equal error rate of 10.5% on the features from the previous study and 6.1% on a new set of features.