Prevalence and Risk Factors of Episiotomy and Perineal Tear in the Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil City, Iraq

H. Ahmed, Warda Abdollah, N. Al-Tawil
{"title":"Prevalence and Risk Factors of Episiotomy and Perineal Tear in the Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil City, Iraq","authors":"H. Ahmed, Warda Abdollah, N. Al-Tawil","doi":"10.15218/EJNM.2019.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: During childbirth, women are at risk for experiencing perineal trauma to the genitalia resulting in a tear of the perineum or the surgical process of an episiotomy. Knowing the prevalence and the risk factors associated with perineal trauma may help in the reduction of episiotomy and prevention of occurrence of tear. The aim of the study was to find out the prevalence and risk factors associated with perineal trauma among women ages 15-48.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil, Kurdistan region, Iraq. All records of mothers (n = 1500) who had been admitted to the delivery room for vaginal delivery during the month of May (2015) were reviewed. Chi-square test of association and binary logistic regression were used to interpret the data.Results: The overall rates of episiotomy, tear, their combined presence, and an intact perineum were: 47.8%, 7.2%, 26.1% and 18.9%, respectively. Incidence of having an episiotomy, tear, or combination of both, were significantly associated with women of young ages and women who were primigravida parity. There was a statistically significant association between high birth weight and the occurrence of perineal trauma. There was no association between perineal trauma and residency (urban/rural), occupation, gender of baby and time of delivery. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that having an episiotomy increased the risk of a tear by more than 30%.Conclusions: The prevalence of episiotomy was found to be 73.9% which is much higher compared to the World Health Organization recommendation which is 10%. Perineal trauma were associated with factors such as age, parity, and birth weight. Episiotomy is a risk factor for a vaginal tear. We recommend further research to inform the development and implementation of restrictive episiotomy policies to reduce and prevent occurrences of perineal trauma.","PeriodicalId":250078,"journal":{"name":"Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15218/EJNM.2019.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and Objectives: During childbirth, women are at risk for experiencing perineal trauma to the genitalia resulting in a tear of the perineum or the surgical process of an episiotomy. Knowing the prevalence and the risk factors associated with perineal trauma may help in the reduction of episiotomy and prevention of occurrence of tear. The aim of the study was to find out the prevalence and risk factors associated with perineal trauma among women ages 15-48.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Maternity Teaching Hospital of Erbil, Kurdistan region, Iraq. All records of mothers (n = 1500) who had been admitted to the delivery room for vaginal delivery during the month of May (2015) were reviewed. Chi-square test of association and binary logistic regression were used to interpret the data.Results: The overall rates of episiotomy, tear, their combined presence, and an intact perineum were: 47.8%, 7.2%, 26.1% and 18.9%, respectively. Incidence of having an episiotomy, tear, or combination of both, were significantly associated with women of young ages and women who were primigravida parity. There was a statistically significant association between high birth weight and the occurrence of perineal trauma. There was no association between perineal trauma and residency (urban/rural), occupation, gender of baby and time of delivery. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that having an episiotomy increased the risk of a tear by more than 30%.Conclusions: The prevalence of episiotomy was found to be 73.9% which is much higher compared to the World Health Organization recommendation which is 10%. Perineal trauma were associated with factors such as age, parity, and birth weight. Episiotomy is a risk factor for a vaginal tear. We recommend further research to inform the development and implementation of restrictive episiotomy policies to reduce and prevent occurrences of perineal trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克埃尔比勒市妇产教学医院会阴切开及会阴撕裂发生率及危险因素分析
背景和目的:在分娩过程中,妇女有经历会阴创伤的风险,导致会阴撕裂或手术过程中的会阴切开术。了解会阴创伤的发生率及相关危险因素,有助于减少会阴切开术,预防撕裂的发生。这项研究的目的是找出15-48岁女性会阴创伤的患病率和相关的危险因素。方法:在伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区埃尔比勒妇产教学医院进行横断面研究。回顾2015年5月(5月)所有在产房进行阴道分娩的母亲(n = 1500)的记录。采用关联卡方检验和二元逻辑回归对数据进行解释。结果:会阴切开术、撕裂及其合并和会阴完整的总发生率分别为47.8%、7.2%、26.1%和18.9%。外阴切开术、撕裂或两者结合的发生率与年轻女性和初产期女性显著相关。高出生体重与会阴创伤的发生有显著的统计学意义。会阴创伤与居住地(城市/农村)、职业、婴儿性别和分娩时间没有关联。二元逻辑回归分析显示,会阴切开术使撕裂的风险增加了30%以上。结论:外阴切开术的患病率为73.9%,远高于世界卫生组织推荐的10%。会阴创伤与年龄、胎次、出生体重等因素有关。会阴切开术是阴道撕裂的危险因素。我们建议进一步研究,以制定和实施限制性会阴切开术政策,以减少和预防会阴创伤的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home Health Care Services Delivered by Nurses to the Relatives with COVID-19 Mothers’ Knowledge Regarding Home Care Management of Neonatal Jaundice in Qaladze - Sulaymaniyah City Knowledge and Attitudes about Precautionary Measures of COVID-19 among Undergraduate Students: A Comparative Study Lifestyle Factors and Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cross-sectional Study Caregiver’s Knowledge regarding Homecare Management of Spastic Cerebral Palsy Children Under 12 Years Old in Rapareen Province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1