Distinguishing between automatic and manual aspects of model driven development

13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'06) Pub Date : 2006-03-27 DOI:10.1109/ECBS.2006.38

Yucong Duan, Yuqing Gu, Xiaolan Fu, S. Cheung, J. Wang, Q.P. Hu

{"title":"Distinguishing between automatic and manual aspects of model driven development","authors":"Yucong Duan, Yuqing Gu, Xiaolan Fu, S. Cheung, J. Wang, Q.P. Hu","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2006.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manual portion and automatable aspects are often not explicitly differentiated and defined in most model driven software development (MDSD). This may hinder the advancement of the automation level of MDSD with problems such as defining the boundaries of automation tasks, and measuring the workload for model transformations (MT), etc. In common senses, the two parts are not distinguishable because they belong to irrespective subjective and objective conceptual areas respectively. By discussing this issue specifically for MDSD, a conceptual exclusion approach for differentiation based on an extended entity relationship (ER) model is proposed. A conceptual framework called MIB/CSD (manual work, inheritance, behaviorism/cardinality, static, dynamic) to implement the differentiation approach is designed. Feasibility of the differentiation work with regard to UML is discussed in both the theoretical aspect with the extended ER model and the practical aspect with some existing evidences","PeriodicalId":430872,"journal":{"name":"13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'06)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2006.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Manual portion and automatable aspects are often not explicitly differentiated and defined in most model driven software development (MDSD). This may hinder the advancement of the automation level of MDSD with problems such as defining the boundaries of automation tasks, and measuring the workload for model transformations (MT), etc. In common senses, the two parts are not distinguishable because they belong to irrespective subjective and objective conceptual areas respectively. By discussing this issue specifically for MDSD, a conceptual exclusion approach for differentiation based on an extended entity relationship (ER) model is proposed. A conceptual framework called MIB/CSD (manual work, inheritance, behaviorism/cardinality, static, dynamic) to implement the differentiation approach is designed. Feasibility of the differentiation work with regard to UML is discussed in both the theoretical aspect with the extended ER model and the practical aspect with some existing evidences

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

区分模型驱动开发的自动和手动方面

在大多数模型驱动软件开发(MDSD)中，手工部分和自动化方面通常没有明确的区分和定义。这可能会阻碍MDSD自动化级别的进步，比如定义自动化任务的边界，以及度量模型转换(MT)的工作负载等问题。在一般意义上，这两个部分是不可区分的，因为它们分别属于主观和客观的概念领域。通过对MDSD的具体讨论，提出了一种基于扩展实体关系(ER)模型的概念排除方法。设计了一个称为MIB/CSD(手工工作、继承、行为主义/基数、静态、动态)的概念框架来实现差异化方法。通过扩展的ER模型，从理论和实践两个方面探讨了基于UML的差异化工作的可行性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS'06)

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Rava: designing a Java extension with dynamic object roles Standardized content service system for distributed e-learning resource Requirements engineering for the adviser portal bank system Requirements for distributed mission-critical decision support systems Conceptual patterns