A simulation comparison of time-hopping PAM and interference suppressing OFDM in multiuser ultra wideband communications systems

D. Popescu, P. Yaddanapudi, N. Vallepalli, G. Raju
{"title":"A simulation comparison of time-hopping PAM and interference suppressing OFDM in multiuser ultra wideband communications systems","authors":"D. Popescu, P. Yaddanapudi, N. Vallepalli, G. Raju","doi":"10.1109/RWS.2008.4463632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present a side-by-side comparison between time-hopping (TH) impulse radios (IR) based on pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) and interference suppressing (IS) OFDM-based ultra wideband (UWB) systems in multi-user scenarios. For both systems we use minimum mean squared error (MMSE) receivers, and look at the raw bit error rate (BER) at the physical layer as performance criterion. This is evaluated using simulations for various scenarios that include additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), multipath and/or multiple access interference, and narrowband interference. Numerical results indicate that in the presence of AWGN only, the two systems display similar performance, while for multipath propagation the TH-PAM IR system outperforms the IS-OFDM system. However, in the presence of narrowband interference the IS-OFDM system outperforms the TH-PAM IR system which displays poor performance in this case.","PeriodicalId":431471,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RWS.2008.4463632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this paper we present a side-by-side comparison between time-hopping (TH) impulse radios (IR) based on pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) and interference suppressing (IS) OFDM-based ultra wideband (UWB) systems in multi-user scenarios. For both systems we use minimum mean squared error (MMSE) receivers, and look at the raw bit error rate (BER) at the physical layer as performance criterion. This is evaluated using simulations for various scenarios that include additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), multipath and/or multiple access interference, and narrowband interference. Numerical results indicate that in the presence of AWGN only, the two systems display similar performance, while for multipath propagation the TH-PAM IR system outperforms the IS-OFDM system. However, in the presence of narrowband interference the IS-OFDM system outperforms the TH-PAM IR system which displays poor performance in this case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多用户超宽带通信系统中跳时PAM与抑制干扰OFDM的仿真比较
本文对多用户场景下基于脉冲幅度调制(PAM)的时跳(TH)脉冲无线电(IR)和基于干扰抑制(IS) ofdm的超宽带(UWB)系统进行了并排比较。对于这两个系统,我们都使用最小均方误差(MMSE)接收器,并将物理层的原始误码率(BER)作为性能标准。这是通过模拟各种场景来评估的,包括加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)、多径和/或多址干扰以及窄带干扰。数值结果表明,在仅存在AWGN的情况下,两种系统表现出相似的性能,而对于多径传播,TH-PAM IR系统优于IS-OFDM系统。然而,在窄带干扰存在的情况下,IS-OFDM系统优于TH-PAM IR系统,TH-PAM IR系统在这种情况下表现出较差的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of RF circuit imperfections on multi-carrier and single-carrier based transmissions at 60 GHz A low phase noise and low power series coupled quadrature VCO using reconfigurable LC tank Emerging technologies in software defined receivers Simple accurate closed-form approximations for the crossing rates of Weibull fading channels in multibranch diversity systems Electromagnetic field strength assessment errors in flat roof vicinities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1