Pro tip: Screen-based payment methods increase negative feelings in consumers but do not increase tip sizes

Francine W Goh, Alexandria C. Jungck, J. Stevens
{"title":"Pro tip: Screen-based payment methods increase negative feelings in consumers but do not increase tip sizes","authors":"Francine W Goh, Alexandria C. Jungck, J. Stevens","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/yfne8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaving monetary tips for servers is a commonplace occurrence in the United States. Tipping research has proposed that consumers tip to serve a variety of motives such as to ensure good service on future patronage, supplement servers' wages, and comply with social norms. Meanwhile, research on environmental factors that affect tipping behavior, such as method of bill payment, have yielded mixed findings. The advancement of technology has increased the use of screen-based payment methods that feature options with differing suggested tip amounts. This technology may pressure consumers into leaving larger tips or start tipping in situations where they previously would not. Using a computer-based study, we simulated limited-service experiences where customers have short interactions with their servers (e.g., ordering a cup of coffee to-go at a coffee shop). We studied how the availability of screen-based payment methods affected consumer feelings about establishments and tip amounts. Results indicated that, in our simulated coffee shop scenario, people feel negatively about screen-based payment methods and may avoid limited-service establishments that use them, but they did not leave larger tips when compared to other payment methods. Moreover, people did not tip more when a server was visible (versus absent) and empathy did not moderate this effect. Together, these findings suggest that people tip to comply with social norms in limited-service environments even if they may feel negatively about the consumer experience.","PeriodicalId":293336,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Behavioral Sciences","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yfne8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leaving monetary tips for servers is a commonplace occurrence in the United States. Tipping research has proposed that consumers tip to serve a variety of motives such as to ensure good service on future patronage, supplement servers' wages, and comply with social norms. Meanwhile, research on environmental factors that affect tipping behavior, such as method of bill payment, have yielded mixed findings. The advancement of technology has increased the use of screen-based payment methods that feature options with differing suggested tip amounts. This technology may pressure consumers into leaving larger tips or start tipping in situations where they previously would not. Using a computer-based study, we simulated limited-service experiences where customers have short interactions with their servers (e.g., ordering a cup of coffee to-go at a coffee shop). We studied how the availability of screen-based payment methods affected consumer feelings about establishments and tip amounts. Results indicated that, in our simulated coffee shop scenario, people feel negatively about screen-based payment methods and may avoid limited-service establishments that use them, but they did not leave larger tips when compared to other payment methods. Moreover, people did not tip more when a server was visible (versus absent) and empathy did not moderate this effect. Together, these findings suggest that people tip to comply with social norms in limited-service environments even if they may feel negatively about the consumer experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业提示:基于屏幕的支付方式会增加消费者的负面情绪,但不会增加小费金额
在美国,给服务员小费是司空见惯的事。小费研究表明,消费者给小费是出于多种动机,比如确保未来顾客得到良好的服务,补充服务员的工资,以及遵守社会规范。与此同时,对影响付小费行为的环境因素(如付账单的方式)的研究得出了不同的结果。科技的进步增加了基于屏幕的支付方式的使用,这种支付方式提供了不同建议小费金额的选项。这项技术可能会迫使消费者留下更多的小费,或者在他们以前不会给的情况下开始给小费。使用基于计算机的研究,我们模拟了有限的服务体验,其中客户与他们的服务器有短暂的交互(例如,在咖啡店点一杯外带咖啡)。我们研究了基于屏幕的支付方式的可用性如何影响消费者对场所和小费金额的感受。结果表明,在我们模拟的咖啡店场景中,人们对基于屏幕的支付方式持负面态度,可能会避开使用这种支付方式的有限服务场所,但与其他支付方式相比,他们并没有留下更多的小费。此外,当服务员在场时(与不在场相比),人们不会给更多的小费,同理心也不会缓和这种影响。总之,这些发现表明,在服务有限的环境中,人们给小费是为了遵守社会规范,即使他们可能对消费体验感到负面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Cancel Culture Affect the Bottom Line? A Timeseries Analysis of Sentiment and Emotion on the Efficacy of the Call to Cancel Against Abercrombie & Fitch Social Construct of Masculinity Towards Mental Health: A Literature Review Screen Exposure and Child Development: A Contextual Analysis of Pandemic Personality, Sexuality, and Beauty Standards: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Canadian and German Women's Cosmetic Surgery Behaviours and Attitudes Using Promotional Strategies to Increase the Use of Miswak among Teenagers in Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1