Effects of Reading Motivation and Meta-comprehension on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Intellectual Disabilities

Fernanda Rodriguez Poblete, Antonio P. Gutiérrez de Blume, Christian M. Soto
{"title":"Effects of Reading Motivation and Meta-comprehension on the Reading Comprehension of Students with Intellectual Disabilities","authors":"Fernanda Rodriguez Poblete, Antonio P. Gutiérrez de Blume, Christian M. Soto","doi":"10.25115/ejrep.v20i58.4806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction.  Reading comprehension is an essential skill to achieve autonomy and independence within our literate society. Unfortunately, several studies show that students with intellectual disabilities tend to achieve low reading levels. In normotypical students, the influence of reading motivation and metacomprehension habilities on reading comprehension has been extensively studied. In this sense, it is interesting and innovative to explore the influence of these variables on the population of students with IDs.\nMethod.  The present research had two main objectives: 1) to describe the level of reading motivation and meta-comprehension skills present in students with intellectual disabilities (N=27); and 2) to predict the impact of these variables on their performance in reading. A standardized reading comprehension test (LECTUM), the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ), and different instruments to assess aspects of Metacomprehension (metacomprehension inventory, inconsistency detection test and confidence in performance judgments) were applied.\nResults.  The analysis of the data through descriptive statistics allowed characterizing the performance of the students in each of the variables considered. In turn, the stepwise linear regression analysis showed that, together, the total number of inconsistencies detected as a measure of metacomprehension monitoring and two dimensions of metacognitive knowledge (knowledge about cognition and regulation after problematic understanding), predict 67% of the variability in participants’ reading comprehension performance.\nDiscussion and Conclusion.  Implications for special educational practice and reading comprehension theory are discussed.","PeriodicalId":366296,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v20i58.4806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction.  Reading comprehension is an essential skill to achieve autonomy and independence within our literate society. Unfortunately, several studies show that students with intellectual disabilities tend to achieve low reading levels. In normotypical students, the influence of reading motivation and metacomprehension habilities on reading comprehension has been extensively studied. In this sense, it is interesting and innovative to explore the influence of these variables on the population of students with IDs. Method.  The present research had two main objectives: 1) to describe the level of reading motivation and meta-comprehension skills present in students with intellectual disabilities (N=27); and 2) to predict the impact of these variables on their performance in reading. A standardized reading comprehension test (LECTUM), the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ), and different instruments to assess aspects of Metacomprehension (metacomprehension inventory, inconsistency detection test and confidence in performance judgments) were applied. Results.  The analysis of the data through descriptive statistics allowed characterizing the performance of the students in each of the variables considered. In turn, the stepwise linear regression analysis showed that, together, the total number of inconsistencies detected as a measure of metacomprehension monitoring and two dimensions of metacognitive knowledge (knowledge about cognition and regulation after problematic understanding), predict 67% of the variability in participants’ reading comprehension performance. Discussion and Conclusion.  Implications for special educational practice and reading comprehension theory are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读动机和元理解对智力障碍学生阅读理解的影响
介绍。在我们的文化社会中,阅读理解是实现自主和独立的基本技能。不幸的是,一些研究表明,有智力障碍的学生往往达到较低的阅读水平。在正常学生中,阅读动机和元理解能力对阅读理解的影响已被广泛研究。从这个意义上说,探索这些变量对ids学生人口的影响是有趣和创新的方法。本研究有两个主要目的:1)描述智力障碍学生的阅读动机和元理解技能水平(N=27);2)预测这些变量对其阅读表现的影响。采用了标准化阅读理解测试(LECTUM)、阅读动机问卷(MRQ)和不同的元理解评估工具(元理解量表、不一致检测测试和表现判断置信度)。通过描述性统计对数据进行分析,可以描述学生在每个考虑的变量中的表现。反过来,逐步线性回归分析表明,作为元理解监测指标的不一致性总数和元认知知识的两个维度(关于问题理解后的认知和调节的知识)共同预测了参与者阅读理解表现中67%的变异性。讨论与结论。讨论了对特殊教育实践和阅读理解理论的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emociones transferidas por estudiantes en clases interactivas de dibujo con tabletas digitales Learning patterns and social-emotional learning of balkan students in secondary education: a cross-cultural discussion Teaching motivational profiles related to intention to leave the teaching profession Resiliencia como factor de protección hacia las creencias y actitudes violentas de estudiantes universitarios del ámbito educativo Mental health in school teachers: An explanatory model with emotional intelligence and coping strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1