“I am Guarding it from Mess and Measure”: Poetics of Order/Disorder in Frank O’Hara’s “Urban Pastoral”

Ikram Hili
{"title":"“I am Guarding it from Mess and Measure”: Poetics of Order/Disorder in Frank O’Hara’s “Urban Pastoral”","authors":"Ikram Hili","doi":"10.22492/IJAH.6.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postwar America gave rise to multiple literary traditions, often referred to as the era’s counterpoetics in the sense that they veered from the Eliotic dictum of impersonality, in particular, and from the rigid academic verse of New Criticism, in general. Prominent among these groups are the Confessionals, the Beats and poets of the New York School. Their visions of poetry might seem irreconcilable at times; yet, these poets do share their discontent with the era’s containment culture. An eminent figure of the New York School, Frank O’Hara devoted his creative energy to a vibrant and vivid rendering of a disordered yet compelling city such as NYC. Its frantic atmosphere speaks to his imagination, fuels his aesthetic verve and, in a synergetic manner, feeds on it, gleaning order/meaning from the poet’s words. In this respect, O’Hara’s poetry can be construed as a containment of an established literary order, embodied in the rigorous dictates of New Criticism, but most important, as an outburst of meaningful disorder that finds strong resonance in life within NYC. Meaningful it is, for such disorder liberates the poet from feelings of vacuity and loss amplified especially by postwar anxiety, substantiating the poet’s thought that, after all, “people do not totally regret their life,” as O’Hara puts it (O’Hara, 1995, p. 97). In probing into the synergy between O’Hara’s poetry and his city, this paper aims at examining the way in which the city, in O’Hara’s words again, “flatters meanings of my life I cannot find,” and in so doing, it not only invests the poet’s life with meaning but also galvanizes his quest for meaning itself (O’Hara, 1995, p. 230).","PeriodicalId":426535,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/IJAH.6.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postwar America gave rise to multiple literary traditions, often referred to as the era’s counterpoetics in the sense that they veered from the Eliotic dictum of impersonality, in particular, and from the rigid academic verse of New Criticism, in general. Prominent among these groups are the Confessionals, the Beats and poets of the New York School. Their visions of poetry might seem irreconcilable at times; yet, these poets do share their discontent with the era’s containment culture. An eminent figure of the New York School, Frank O’Hara devoted his creative energy to a vibrant and vivid rendering of a disordered yet compelling city such as NYC. Its frantic atmosphere speaks to his imagination, fuels his aesthetic verve and, in a synergetic manner, feeds on it, gleaning order/meaning from the poet’s words. In this respect, O’Hara’s poetry can be construed as a containment of an established literary order, embodied in the rigorous dictates of New Criticism, but most important, as an outburst of meaningful disorder that finds strong resonance in life within NYC. Meaningful it is, for such disorder liberates the poet from feelings of vacuity and loss amplified especially by postwar anxiety, substantiating the poet’s thought that, after all, “people do not totally regret their life,” as O’Hara puts it (O’Hara, 1995, p. 97). In probing into the synergy between O’Hara’s poetry and his city, this paper aims at examining the way in which the city, in O’Hara’s words again, “flatters meanings of my life I cannot find,” and in so doing, it not only invests the poet’s life with meaning but also galvanizes his quest for meaning itself (O’Hara, 1995, p. 230).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我守着它,不让它乱与尺度”:弗兰克·奥哈拉《城市田园》中有序/无序的诗学
战后的美国产生了多种文学传统,通常被称为这个时代的反诗学,因为它们偏离了艾略特式的非人格格言,特别是偏离了新批评主义僵化的学术诗歌。这些团体中最突出的是忏悔派、垮掉派和纽约学派的诗人。他们对诗歌的看法有时似乎不可调和;然而,这些诗人确实对那个时代的遏制文化感到不满。作为纽约学派的杰出人物,弗兰克·奥哈拉(Frank O 'Hara)将他的创作精力投入到一个充满活力和生动的呈现一个混乱而又引人注目的城市,如纽约。它疯狂的气氛激发了他的想象力,激发了他的审美神韵,并以一种协同的方式,以它为食,从诗人的话语中收集秩序/意义。在这方面,奥哈拉的诗歌可以被理解为对既定文学秩序的遏制,体现在新批评主义的严格要求中,但最重要的是,它是对有意义的混乱的爆发,在纽约的生活中找到了强烈的共鸣。它是有意义的,因为这种混乱将诗人从空虚和失落的感觉中解放出来,尤其是被战后的焦虑放大了,证实了诗人的想法,毕竟,“人们并不完全后悔他们的生活,”正如奥哈拉所说的那样(奥哈拉,1995,第97页)。在探讨奥哈拉的诗歌和他的城市之间的协同作用时,本文旨在研究城市的方式,用奥哈拉的话来说,“奉承我的生活中我找不到的意义”,这样做,它不仅赋予诗人的生活意义,而且激发了他对意义本身的追求(奥哈拉,1995,第230页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resilience in Times of Need Hemingway and Mussolini: A Study in Contrasts The Humanities and Fire Graphic Queering of Mental Illness: Nagata’s My Lesbian Experience with Loneliness as Counter Discourse Yinyangism: Rethinking Western Dualism Regarding Sex and Gender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1