Scenarios using situation awareness in a simulation environment for eliciting insider threat behavior

L. Reinerman-Jones, G. Matthews, R. Wohleber, Eric Ortiz
{"title":"Scenarios using situation awareness in a simulation environment for eliciting insider threat behavior","authors":"L. Reinerman-Jones, G. Matthews, R. Wohleber, Eric Ortiz","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2017.7929611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important topic in cybersecurity is validating Active Indicators (AI), which are stimuli that can be implemented in systems to trigger responses from individuals who might or might not be Insider Threats (ITs). The way in which a person responds to the AI is being validated for identifying a potential threat and a non-threat. In order to execute this validation process, it is important to create a paradigm that allows manipulation of AIs for measuring response. The scenarios are posed in a manner that require participants to be situationally aware that they are being monitored and have to act deceptively. In particular, manipulations in the environment should no differences between conditions relative to immersion and ease of use, but the narrative should be the driving force behind non-deceptive and IT responses. The success of the narrative and the simulation environment to induce such behaviors is determined by immersion, usability, and stress response questionnaires, and performance. Initial results of the feasibility to use a narrative reliant upon situation awareness of monitoring and evasion are discussed.","PeriodicalId":252066,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2017.7929611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

An important topic in cybersecurity is validating Active Indicators (AI), which are stimuli that can be implemented in systems to trigger responses from individuals who might or might not be Insider Threats (ITs). The way in which a person responds to the AI is being validated for identifying a potential threat and a non-threat. In order to execute this validation process, it is important to create a paradigm that allows manipulation of AIs for measuring response. The scenarios are posed in a manner that require participants to be situationally aware that they are being monitored and have to act deceptively. In particular, manipulations in the environment should no differences between conditions relative to immersion and ease of use, but the narrative should be the driving force behind non-deceptive and IT responses. The success of the narrative and the simulation environment to induce such behaviors is determined by immersion, usability, and stress response questionnaires, and performance. Initial results of the feasibility to use a narrative reliant upon situation awareness of monitoring and evasion are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在模拟环境中使用态势感知来引出内部威胁行为的场景
网络安全中的一个重要主题是验证主动指示器(AI),这是一种可以在系统中实施的刺激,以触发可能是或可能不是内部威胁(ITs)的个人的响应。人们对人工智能的反应方式正在被验证,以识别潜在威胁和非威胁。为了执行这个验证过程,重要的是创建一个允许操纵ai来测量响应的范例。这些场景的设置方式要求参与者意识到他们正在被监视,并且必须采取欺骗性的行动。特别是,环境中的操作不应该与沉浸感和易用性相关,但叙事应该成为非欺骗性和IT反应背后的驱动力。诱导这种行为的叙述和模拟环境的成功取决于沉浸感、可用性、压力反应问卷和表现。讨论了使用依赖于监测和逃避的情况意识的叙述的可行性的初步结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rightward attentional bias in windshield displays: Implication towards external human machine interfaces for self-driving cars Situation-based ontologies for a computational framework for identity focusing on crime scenes Automation bias with a conversational interface: User confirmation of misparsed information Using context and robot-human communication to resolve unexpected situational conflicts A model based on rough sets for situation comprehension and projection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1