Exploring user profiles based on their explainability requirements in interactive systems

Henrique Louzada, Gabriel Chaves, Lesandro Ponciano
{"title":"Exploring user profiles based on their explainability requirements in interactive systems","authors":"Henrique Louzada, Gabriel Chaves, Lesandro Ponciano","doi":"10.1145/3424953.3426545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depending on the way they are designed, interactive systems may inadvertently influence the opinions, choices and actions of their users. To avoid this problem, there has been a growing demand for this type of system to be able to explain to users how their outputs are generated. This demand is called the \"right to an explanation\", or the explainability requirement. User perceptions are still little addressed in this context, for example: (1) do people value software explainability? (2) what are the typical user profiles in terms of their demand for explainability? This work seeks to elucidate users' perception and to identify profiles of users in terms of their perceptions of explainability requirement. The method consists of a questionnaire, data mining algorithms and statistical analysis to uncover and analyze the profiles of users. In a case study conducted with 61 people, we found 6 profiles, each one representing a different perception and type of requirement about software explainability. The implications of these profiles for the design of interactive systems are discussed.","PeriodicalId":102113,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424953.3426545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Depending on the way they are designed, interactive systems may inadvertently influence the opinions, choices and actions of their users. To avoid this problem, there has been a growing demand for this type of system to be able to explain to users how their outputs are generated. This demand is called the "right to an explanation", or the explainability requirement. User perceptions are still little addressed in this context, for example: (1) do people value software explainability? (2) what are the typical user profiles in terms of their demand for explainability? This work seeks to elucidate users' perception and to identify profiles of users in terms of their perceptions of explainability requirement. The method consists of a questionnaire, data mining algorithms and statistical analysis to uncover and analyze the profiles of users. In a case study conducted with 61 people, we found 6 profiles, each one representing a different perception and type of requirement about software explainability. The implications of these profiles for the design of interactive systems are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在交互式系统中,根据用户的可解释性需求探索用户配置文件
交互系统可能会在不经意间影响用户的意见、选择和行为,这取决于它们的设计方式。为了避免这个问题,越来越多的人要求这种类型的系统能够向用户解释他们的输出是如何产生的。这种要求被称为“解释权”,或可解释性要求。在这种情况下,用户感知仍然很少得到解决,例如:(1)人们是否重视软件的可解释性?(2)典型用户对可解释性的需求是什么?这项工作旨在阐明用户的感知,并根据用户对可解释性要求的感知来确定用户的概况。该方法由问卷调查、数据挖掘算法和统计分析组成,以揭示和分析用户的个人资料。在一个由61个人组成的案例研究中,我们发现了6个概要文件,每个概要文件代表了关于软件可解释性的不同感知和需求类型。讨论了这些概要文件对交互系统设计的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX trek: a post-interaction journey from immersive experience logs Possibilities for the digital literacy of the older people in times of social distancing App coronavírus-SUS: an evalution using the ergonomic criteria of usability Beauty tech nails: towards interaction and functionality ChartVision
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1