To branch or not to branch that is the question

Brendan Murphy, L. Williams
{"title":"To branch or not to branch that is the question","authors":"Brendan Murphy, L. Williams","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most contentious areas in software development is branching. Proponents of agile development methodologies are often against the concept of branching as a matter of principle, other large software development projects, such as Windows, are heavy users of branches to control the software generated by thousands of its engineers. Microsoft is migrating its development processes to be able to simultaneously produce software as both stand-alone products and as a SAAS (e.g. Windows 8 and Azure), requiring a re-architecture of these processes. To fully understand the impact of any changes to their development processes the product groups addressed the question of whether and how to use branching within its development process. Bases on this assessment this talk attempts to go back to first principles in regard to software development and shows that there are a lot more similarities than differences between agile and non-agile software development methods. The talk will also discuss the pros and cons of branching identifying where it will positively and negatively impact software development.","PeriodicalId":332420,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW.2013.6688869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most contentious areas in software development is branching. Proponents of agile development methodologies are often against the concept of branching as a matter of principle, other large software development projects, such as Windows, are heavy users of branches to control the software generated by thousands of its engineers. Microsoft is migrating its development processes to be able to simultaneously produce software as both stand-alone products and as a SAAS (e.g. Windows 8 and Azure), requiring a re-architecture of these processes. To fully understand the impact of any changes to their development processes the product groups addressed the question of whether and how to use branching within its development process. Bases on this assessment this talk attempts to go back to first principles in regard to software development and shows that there are a lot more similarities than differences between agile and non-agile software development methods. The talk will also discuss the pros and cons of branching identifying where it will positively and negatively impact software development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分支还是不分支,这是个问题
软件开发中最具争议的领域之一是分支。敏捷开发方法的支持者通常反对分支的概念,因为其他大型软件开发项目,比如Windows,大量使用分支来控制由数千名工程师生成的软件。微软正在迁移其开发流程,以便能够同时以独立产品和SAAS(例如Windows 8和Azure)的形式生产软件,这需要对这些流程进行重新架构。为了充分理解任何更改对其开发过程的影响,产品组处理了是否以及如何在其开发过程中使用分支的问题。基于这一评估,本演讲试图回到软件开发的首要原则,并展示了敏捷和非敏捷软件开发方法之间的相似之处远远多于不同点。该演讲还将讨论分支的利弊,确定它对软件开发的积极和消极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bug localisation through diverse sources of information A chain of accountabilities in open systems based on assured entrustments Estimating response time distribution of server application in software aging phenomenon Safety assessment of software-intensive medical devices: Introducing a safety quality model approach Detection of missing requirements using base requirements pairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1