Evaluation of the Phase-Aggression Criterion for PIO Detection in Real-time 

S. Fasiello, P. Masarati, M. Jump
{"title":"Evaluation of the Phase-Aggression Criterion for PIO Detection in Real-time ","authors":"S. Fasiello, P. Masarati, M. Jump","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the results of a pilot-in-the-loop experiment performed to investigate the efficacy of a pilot induced oscillation (PIO) or adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling (RPC) real-time detection method, to be implemented as an in-cockpit warning system. A test pilot performed a number of simulated flights inside the Heliflight-R simulator at the University of Liverpool. Two handling qualities (HQ) mission task element (MTE) maneuvers were chosen, namely Precision Hover and Lateral Reposition. The baseline dynamics were those of a FLIGHTLAB BO105-like helicopter model, as used in previous tests; changes in rate limits were introduced to induce the pilot-vehicle system (PVS) to be more RPC/PIO prone, and to observe pilot’s adaptation to these variations causing system instabilities during the chosen MTEs. To objectively measure the severity of the PIO encountered during the tests, the PhaseAggression Criterion (PAC) has been used. This method has been developed to allow for real-time PIO detection in order to provide the information inside the cockpit. In addition, pilot subjective ratings were collected, by using the HQs, PIO and Pilot Workload rating scales. Overall, the results show a good correlation between objective and subjective evaluations, and that it is possible to detect PIOs in real-time. The information can be provided to the pilot by means of visual, aural or haptic cues, which is the work the authors are currently carrying out.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a pilot-in-the-loop experiment performed to investigate the efficacy of a pilot induced oscillation (PIO) or adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling (RPC) real-time detection method, to be implemented as an in-cockpit warning system. A test pilot performed a number of simulated flights inside the Heliflight-R simulator at the University of Liverpool. Two handling qualities (HQ) mission task element (MTE) maneuvers were chosen, namely Precision Hover and Lateral Reposition. The baseline dynamics were those of a FLIGHTLAB BO105-like helicopter model, as used in previous tests; changes in rate limits were introduced to induce the pilot-vehicle system (PVS) to be more RPC/PIO prone, and to observe pilot’s adaptation to these variations causing system instabilities during the chosen MTEs. To objectively measure the severity of the PIO encountered during the tests, the PhaseAggression Criterion (PAC) has been used. This method has been developed to allow for real-time PIO detection in order to provide the information inside the cockpit. In addition, pilot subjective ratings were collected, by using the HQs, PIO and Pilot Workload rating scales. Overall, the results show a good correlation between objective and subjective evaluations, and that it is possible to detect PIOs in real-time. The information can be provided to the pilot by means of visual, aural or haptic cues, which is the work the authors are currently carrying out.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时PIO检测的相位攻击准则评估
本文介绍了一项驾驶员在环试验的结果,该试验旨在研究驾驶员诱导振荡(PIO)或不利旋翼机-驾驶员耦合(RPC)实时检测方法的有效性,该方法将作为座舱内预警系统实施。一名试飞员在利物浦大学的Heliflight-R模拟器中进行了多次模拟飞行。选择了精确悬停和横向复位两种操纵质量任务单元机动方式。基线动力学是FLIGHTLAB bo105型直升机模型,在之前的测试中使用;引入速率限制的变化来诱导驾驶员-车辆系统(PVS)更容易发生RPC/PIO,并观察驾驶员对这些变化的适应,这些变化导致系统在选定的mte期间不稳定。为了客观地测量测试期间遇到的PIO的严重程度,使用了PhaseAggression Criterion (PAC)。这种方法的开发是为了允许实时PIO检测,以便提供驾驶舱内部的信息。此外,通过使用总部、PIO和飞行员工作量评分量表收集飞行员主观评分。总体而言,结果表明客观和主观评价之间存在良好的相关性,并且可以实时检测pio。这些信息可以通过视觉、听觉或触觉线索提供给飞行员,这是作者目前正在进行的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hover Performance in Ground Effect Prediction Using a Dual Solver Computational Methodology AW609 Civil Tiltrotor Drive Train Torsional Stability Analysis and Certification Test Campaign  Boiling Down Aviation Data: Development of the Aviation Data Distillery Reliability-Driven Analysis, Design and Characterization of Rotorcraft Structures: Decision-Making Framework High-Speed Rotorcraft Pitch Axis Response Type Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1