WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body: Insider Perceptions and Members' Revealed Preferences

Matteo Fiorini, B. Hoekman, P. Mavroidis, Maarja Saluste, Robert Wolfe
{"title":"WTO Dispute Settlement and the Appellate Body: Insider Perceptions and Members' Revealed Preferences","authors":"Matteo Fiorini, B. Hoekman, P. Mavroidis, Maarja Saluste, Robert Wolfe","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3827215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The WTO dispute settlement system is in crisis, following the decision of the United States to block new appointments to the Appellate Body (AB). The AB went into hibernation in December 2019, not having enough sitting members to be able to operate. What do WTO members think of the performance of WTO dispute settlement? How much do WTO members care about the existence and operation of an appeals mechanism? In this paper, we report on the results of a survey of WTO Members' perceptions of the AB and the role it plays (should play). We complement this with data on Members' revealed preferences in their use of the dispute settlement system, their intervention in WTO debates on the AB crisis and their responses to demise of the AB. The data reveal strong support for the basic design of the dispute settlement system but also that the United States is not alone in perceiving that the AB went beyond its mandate. There are substantive questions that need to be addressed if the Appellate Body impasse is to be resolved.","PeriodicalId":170106,"journal":{"name":"CEPR: International Trade & Regional Economics (Topic)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEPR: International Trade & Regional Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3827215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The WTO dispute settlement system is in crisis, following the decision of the United States to block new appointments to the Appellate Body (AB). The AB went into hibernation in December 2019, not having enough sitting members to be able to operate. What do WTO members think of the performance of WTO dispute settlement? How much do WTO members care about the existence and operation of an appeals mechanism? In this paper, we report on the results of a survey of WTO Members' perceptions of the AB and the role it plays (should play). We complement this with data on Members' revealed preferences in their use of the dispute settlement system, their intervention in WTO debates on the AB crisis and their responses to demise of the AB. The data reveal strong support for the basic design of the dispute settlement system but also that the United States is not alone in perceiving that the AB went beyond its mandate. There are substantive questions that need to be addressed if the Appellate Body impasse is to be resolved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WTO争端解决与上诉机构:内部感知与成员的显性偏好
在美国决定阻止上诉机构(AB)的新任命之后,世贸组织争端解决机制陷入危机。2019年12月,由于没有足够的在职成员来运营,该机构进入了冬眠状态。WTO成员如何看待WTO争端解决机制的表现?WTO成员对上诉机制的存在和运作有多关心?在本文中,我们报告了一项调查的结果,该调查调查了WTO成员对AB的看法以及它所扮演(应该扮演)的角色。作为补充,我们还提供了成员在使用争端解决机制时所显示的偏好、他们对WTO争端解决机制危机辩论的干预以及他们对争端解决机制消亡的反应等数据。这些数据显示了对争端解决机制基本设计的强烈支持,但也表明美国并不是唯一一个认为争端解决机制超出了其职责范围的国家。如果要解决上诉机构的僵局,就需要解决一些实质性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Institutions and the Productivity Challenge for European Regions The Political Effects of Immigration: Culture or Economics? Foreign Shocks as Granular Fluctuations Child Labour and Global Value Chains The Persistent Consequences of Adverse Shocks: How the 1970s Shaped UK Regional Inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1