{"title":"Demography","authors":"M. Kritz","doi":"10.4135/9781526470416.n3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overarching goal of this study was to use ecological theory to develop a more expanded conceptualization of the work-family interface, and to identify significant correlates of both positive and negative spillover between work and family. Using a subsample of employed adults from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (n=1,986), results from principal components analysis indicated four distinct dimensions of work-family spillover: negative spillover from work to family, positive spillover from work to family, negative spillover from family to work, and positive spillover from family to work. Results from multivariate regression analyses indicated more resources that facilitate development in work or family settings (e.g., more decision latitude at work, support at work from co-workers and supervisors, emotionally close spouse and family relations) were associated with less negative and more positive spillover between work and family. By contrast, more barriers arising from person-environment interactions at work and in the family (e.g., more pressure at work, spouse disagreement, and perception of family burden) were associated with more negative spillover and less positive spillover between work and family. In some cases results differed significantly by gender, and all results controlled for the potential confounding effects of age, race, education, household income, parental status, marital status, employment status, and personality characteristics.","PeriodicalId":346958,"journal":{"name":"The Sage Handbook of International Migration","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Sage Handbook of International Migration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470416.n3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overarching goal of this study was to use ecological theory to develop a more expanded conceptualization of the work-family interface, and to identify significant correlates of both positive and negative spillover between work and family. Using a subsample of employed adults from the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (n=1,986), results from principal components analysis indicated four distinct dimensions of work-family spillover: negative spillover from work to family, positive spillover from work to family, negative spillover from family to work, and positive spillover from family to work. Results from multivariate regression analyses indicated more resources that facilitate development in work or family settings (e.g., more decision latitude at work, support at work from co-workers and supervisors, emotionally close spouse and family relations) were associated with less negative and more positive spillover between work and family. By contrast, more barriers arising from person-environment interactions at work and in the family (e.g., more pressure at work, spouse disagreement, and perception of family burden) were associated with more negative spillover and less positive spillover between work and family. In some cases results differed significantly by gender, and all results controlled for the potential confounding effects of age, race, education, household income, parental status, marital status, employment status, and personality characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人口统计学
本研究的总体目标是利用生态学理论来发展一个更广泛的工作-家庭界面概念,并确定工作和家庭之间的积极和消极溢出的显著相关性。利用美国中年发展全国调查(n= 1986)的就业成年人子样本,主成分分析结果表明工作-家庭溢出的四个不同维度:从工作到家庭的负溢出、从工作到家庭的正溢出、从家庭到工作的负溢出和从家庭到工作的正溢出。多变量回归分析的结果表明,在工作或家庭环境中促进发展的资源越多(例如,工作中更多的决策空间、同事和主管的支持、情感上亲密的配偶和家庭关系),工作和家庭之间的负面溢出效应就越少,积极溢出效应就越大。相比之下,在工作和家庭中,由于人与环境的相互作用而产生的障碍越多(例如,工作压力更大、配偶意见分歧和对家庭负担的看法),工作和家庭之间的负面溢出就越多,积极溢出就越少。在某些情况下,结果因性别而有显著差异,所有结果都控制了年龄、种族、教育、家庭收入、父母状况、婚姻状况、就业状况和人格特征的潜在混淆效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
European Migration Transition in the Context of Post-Enlargement Migration from and into Central and Eastern Europe Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Multiculturalism and Immigration South Asian Migration History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1